| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Message-ID: <CANiDSCuigeLooqRaDvzEW28pgZu1H42M+oxk_4UEZh=Jue2M8Q@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 2 Jan 2023 13:45:06 +0100
From: Ricardo Ribalda <ribalda@...omium.org>
To: Laurent Pinchart <laurent.pinchart@...asonboard.com>
Cc: Sergey Senozhatsky <senozhatsky@...omium.org>,
Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab@...nel.org>,
Max Staudt <mstaudt@...gle.com>, linux-media@...r.kernel.org,
stable@...r.kernel.org, Yunke Cao <yunkec@...omium.org>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4] media: uvcvideo: Fix race condition with usb_kill_urb
Hi Laurent
Thanks for your review!
On Tue, 27 Dec 2022 at 15:37, Laurent Pinchart
<laurent.pinchart@...asonboard.com> wrote:
>
> On Tue, Dec 27, 2022 at 04:25:01PM +0200, Laurent Pinchart wrote:
> > Hi Ricardo,
> >
> > Thank you for the patch.
> >
> > On Wed, Dec 14, 2022 at 05:31:55PM +0100, Ricardo Ribalda wrote:
> > > usb_kill_urb warranties that all the handlers are finished when it
> > > returns, but does not protect against threads that might be handling
> > > asynchronously the urb.
> > >
> > > For UVC, the function uvc_ctrl_status_event_async() takes care of
> > > control changes asynchronously.
> > >
> > > If the code is executed in the following order:
> > >
> > > CPU 0 CPU 1
> > > ===== =====
> > > uvc_status_complete()
> > > uvc_status_stop()
> > > uvc_ctrl_status_event_work()
> > > uvc_status_start() -> FAIL
> > >
> > > Then uvc_status_start will keep failing and this error will be shown:
> > >
> > > <4>[ 5.540139] URB 0000000000000000 submitted while active
> > > drivers/usb/core/urb.c:378 usb_submit_urb+0x4c3/0x528
> > >
> > > Let's improve the current situation, by not re-submiting the urb if
> > > we are stopping the status event. Also process the queued work
> > > (if any) during stop.
> > >
> > > CPU 0 CPU 1
> > > ===== =====
> > > uvc_status_complete()
> > > uvc_status_stop()
> > > uvc_status_start()
> > > uvc_ctrl_status_event_work() -> FAIL
> > >
> > > Hopefully, with the usb layer protection this should be enough to cover
> > > all the cases.
> > >
> > > Cc: stable@...r.kernel.org
> > > Fixes: e5225c820c05 ("media: uvcvideo: Send a control event when a Control Change interrupt arrives")
> > > Reviewed-by: Yunke Cao <yunkec@...omium.org>
> > > Signed-off-by: Ricardo Ribalda <ribalda@...omium.org>
> > > ---
> > > uvc: Fix race condition on uvc
> > >
> > > Make sure that all the async work is finished when we stop the status urb.
> > >
> > > To: Yunke Cao <yunkec@...omium.org>
> > > To: Sergey Senozhatsky <senozhatsky@...omium.org>
> > > To: Max Staudt <mstaudt@...gle.com>
> > > To: Laurent Pinchart <laurent.pinchart@...asonboard.com>
> > > To: Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab@...nel.org>
> > > Cc: linux-media@...r.kernel.org
> > > Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
> > > ---
> > > Changes in v4:
> > > - Replace bool with atomic_t to avoid compiler reordering
> > > - First complete the async work and then kill the urb to avoid race (Thanks Laurent!)
> > > - Link to v3: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20221212-uvc-race-v3-0-954efc752c9a@chromium.org
> > >
> > > Changes in v3:
> > > - Remove the patch for dev->status, makes more sense in another series, and makes
> > > the zero day less nervous.
> > > - Update reviewed-by (thanks Yunke!).
> > > - Link to v2: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20221212-uvc-race-v2-0-54496cc3b8ab@chromium.org
> > >
> > > Changes in v2:
> > > - Add a patch for not kalloc dev->status
> > > - Redo the logic mechanism, so it also works with suspend (Thanks Yunke!)
> > > - Link to v1: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20221212-uvc-race-v1-0-c52e1783c31d@chromium.org
> > > ---
> > > drivers/media/usb/uvc/uvc_ctrl.c | 3 +++
> > > drivers/media/usb/uvc/uvc_status.c | 6 ++++++
> > > drivers/media/usb/uvc/uvcvideo.h | 1 +
> > > 3 files changed, 10 insertions(+)
> > >
> > > diff --git a/drivers/media/usb/uvc/uvc_ctrl.c b/drivers/media/usb/uvc/uvc_ctrl.c
> > > index c95a2229f4fa..1be6897a7d6d 100644
> > > --- a/drivers/media/usb/uvc/uvc_ctrl.c
> > > +++ b/drivers/media/usb/uvc/uvc_ctrl.c
> > > @@ -1442,6 +1442,9 @@ static void uvc_ctrl_status_event_work(struct work_struct *work)
> > >
> > > uvc_ctrl_status_event(w->chain, w->ctrl, w->data);
> > >
> > > + if (atomic_read(&dev->flush_status))
> > > + return;
> > > +
> > > /* Resubmit the URB. */
> > > w->urb->interval = dev->int_ep->desc.bInterval;
> > > ret = usb_submit_urb(w->urb, GFP_KERNEL);
> > > diff --git a/drivers/media/usb/uvc/uvc_status.c b/drivers/media/usb/uvc/uvc_status.c
> > > index 7518ffce22ed..4a95850cdc1b 100644
> > > --- a/drivers/media/usb/uvc/uvc_status.c
> > > +++ b/drivers/media/usb/uvc/uvc_status.c
> > > @@ -304,10 +304,16 @@ int uvc_status_start(struct uvc_device *dev, gfp_t flags)
> > > if (dev->int_urb == NULL)
> > > return 0;
> > >
> > > + atomic_set(&dev->flush_status, 0);
> > > return usb_submit_urb(dev->int_urb, flags);
> > > }
> > >
> > > void uvc_status_stop(struct uvc_device *dev)
> > > {
> > > + struct uvc_ctrl_work *w = &dev->async_ctrl;
> > > +
> > > + atomic_set(&dev->flush_status, 1);
> >
> > Note that atomic_read() and atomic_set() do no imply any memory barrier
> > on most architectures, as far as I can tell. They essentially become
> > READ_ONCE() and WRITE_ONCE() calls, which guarantee that the compiler
> > will not merge or split loads or stores, or reorder them with respect to
> > load and stores to the *same* memory location, but nothing else. I think
> > you need to add proper barriers, and you can then probably also drop
> > usage of atomic_t.
You are absolutely right! Only a subset of atomic implies memory barriers.
Found this doc particularly good:
https://www.kernel.org/doc/html/v5.10/core-api/atomic_ops.html
> >
> > > + if (cancel_work_sync(&w->work))
> > > + uvc_ctrl_status_event(w->chain, w->ctrl, w->data);
> > > usb_kill_urb(dev->int_urb);
> >
> > This should get rid of the main race (possibly save the barrier issue),
> > but it's not the most efficient option, and can still be problematic.
> > Consider the following case:
> >
> > CPU0 CPU1
> > ---- ----
> >
> > void uvc_status_stop(struct uvc_device *dev) uvc_ctrl_status_event_async()
> > { {
> > ...
> > atomic_set(&dev->flush_status, 1); ...
> > if (cancel_work_sync())
> > ...
> > schedule_work();
> > usb_kill_urb(); }
> > }
> >
> > The usb_kill_urb() call ensures that uvc_ctrl_status_event_async()
> > completes before uvc_status_stop() returns, but there will still be work
> > scheduled in that case. uvc_ctrl_status_event_work() will be run later,
> > and as flush_status is set to 1, the function will not resubmit the URB.
> > That fixes the main race, but leaves the asynchronous control status
> > event handling for after uvc_status_stop() returns, which isn't great.
> >
> > Now, if we consider that uvc_status_start() could be called shortly
> > after uvc_status_stop(), we may get in a situation where
> > uvc_status_start() will reset flush_status to 0 before
> > uvc_ctrl_status_event_async() runs. Both uvc_ctrl_status_event_async()
> > and uvc_status_start() will thus submit the same URB.
> >
> > You can't fix this by first killing the URB and then cancelling the
> > work, as there would then be a risk that uvc_ctrl_status_event_work()
> > would be running in parallel, going past the flush_status check before
> > flush_status gets set to 1 in uvc_status_stop(), and submitting the URB
> > after usb_kill_urb() is called.
> >
> > I think a good fix would be to check flush_status in
> > uvc_ctrl_status_event_async() and avoid the schedule_work() call in that
> > case.
If we do that, then we will be losing an event. I would rather call
cancel_work_sync() again after usb_kill_urb().
> >You could then also move the atomic_set(..., 0) call from
> > uvc_status_start() to the end of uvc_status_stop() (again with proper
> > barriers).
Will do that, it is more "elegant".
>
> Also, as all of this is tricky, comments in appropriate places in the
> code would be very helpful to avoid breaking things later.
>
> > Could you please check the memory barriers and test the above proposal
> > (after double-checking it of course, I may have missed something) ?
> >
> > > }
> > > diff --git a/drivers/media/usb/uvc/uvcvideo.h b/drivers/media/usb/uvc/uvcvideo.h
> > > index df93db259312..1274691f157f 100644
> > > --- a/drivers/media/usb/uvc/uvcvideo.h
> > > +++ b/drivers/media/usb/uvc/uvcvideo.h
> > > @@ -560,6 +560,7 @@ struct uvc_device {
> > > struct usb_host_endpoint *int_ep;
> > > struct urb *int_urb;
> > > u8 *status;
> > > + atomic_t flush_status;
> > > struct input_dev *input;
> > > char input_phys[64];
> > >
>
> --
> Regards,
>
> Laurent Pinchart
--
Ricardo Ribalda
Powered by blists - more mailing lists