linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH V5 2/3] PCI: Create device tree node for selected devices

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Mon, 2 Jan 2023 14:56:18 +0100
From:   Clément Léger <clement.leger@...tlin.com>
To:     Lizhi Hou <lizhi.hou@....com>
Cc:     <linux-pci@...r.kernel.org>, <devicetree@...r.kernel.org>,
        <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, <robh@...nel.org>,
        <frowand.list@...il.com>, <helgaas@...nel.org>, <max.zhen@....com>,
        <sonal.santan@....com>, <larry.liu@....com>, <brian.xu@....com>,
        <stefano.stabellini@...inx.com>, <trix@...hat.com>,
        "Allan.Nielsen@...rochip.com" <Allan.Nielsen@...rochip.com>,
        "Horatiu.Vultur@...rochip.com" <Horatiu.Vultur@...rochip.com>,
        "Steen.Hegelund@...rochip.com" <Steen.Hegelund@...rochip.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH V5 2/3] PCI: Create device tree node for selected
 devices

Le Thu, 15 Dec 2022 09:30:45 -0800,
Lizhi Hou <lizhi.hou@....com> a écrit :

> +};
> +
> +static int of_pci_prop_device_type(struct pci_dev *pdev,
> +				   struct of_changeset *ocs,
> +				   struct device_node *np)
> +{
> +	return of_changeset_add_prop_string(ocs, np, "device_type", "pci");
> +}
> +
> +static int of_pci_prop_address_cells(struct pci_dev *pdev,
> +				     struct of_changeset *ocs,
> +				     struct device_node *np)
> +{
> +	return of_changeset_add_prop_u32(ocs, np, "#address_cells",
> +					 OF_PCI_ADDRESS_CELLS);
> +}
> +
> +static int of_pci_prop_size_cells(struct pci_dev *pdev,
> +				  struct of_changeset *ocs,
> +				  struct device_node *np)
> +{
> +	return of_changeset_add_prop_u32(ocs, np, "#size_cells",
> +					 OF_PCI_SIZE_CELLS);
> +}

Hi Lizhi,

For all these functions, the "pdev" parameter is actually unused.

[snip]

> +
> +static int of_pci_prop_compatible(struct pci_dev *pdev,
> +				  struct of_changeset *ocs,
> +				  struct device_node *np)
> +{
> +	const char *compat_strs[PROP_COMPAT_NUM] = { 0 };
> +	int i, ret;
> +
> +	compat_strs[PROP_COMPAT_PCI_VVVV_DDDD] =
> +		kasprintf(GFP_KERNEL, "pci%x,%x", pdev->vendor, pdev->device);

Maybe it should be better to use "pci%04x,%04x" to keep the existing
naming.

-- 
Clément Léger,
Embedded Linux and Kernel engineer at Bootlin
https://bootlin.com