[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <91c8fc96-083d-74b7-3015-e76f1ab59cec@broadcom.com>
Date: Mon, 2 Jan 2023 14:58:14 +0100
From: Arend van Spriel <arend.vanspriel@...adcom.com>
To: Aditya Garg <gargaditya08@...e.com>,
Hector Martin <marcan@...can.st>
Cc: Ian Lin <ian.lin@...ineon.com>,
"alep@...ress.com" <alep@...ress.com>,
"brcm80211-dev-list@...adcom.com" <brcm80211-dev-list@...adcom.com>,
"brcm80211-dev-list@...ress.com" <brcm80211-dev-list@...ress.com>,
"franky.lin@...adcom.com" <franky.lin@...adcom.com>,
"hante.meuleman@...adcom.com" <hante.meuleman@...adcom.com>,
"kvalo@...nel.org" <kvalo@...nel.org>,
"Double.Lo@...ineon.com" <Double.Lo@...ineon.com>,
"linux-wireless@...r.kernel.org" <linux-wireless@...r.kernel.org>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Asahi Linux <asahi@...ts.linux.dev>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 2/4] brcmfmac: Support 89459 pcie
On 1/2/2023 10:45 AM, Aditya Garg wrote:
> Hi Hector
>
>>
>> Is the CYW89459 just a rebrand of the BCM4355, or just a subset? If it
>> is a rebrand, it's okay if we call our Apple firmware
>> brcmfmac89459-pcie* (note that we use per-board firmware names, so it
>> wouldn't conflict with a generic one). However, if CYW89459 only refers
>> to specific variants, I think the firmware should be named after the
>> overall bcm4355 family.
>>
>> I'm guessing you intend to ship firmware for this. Would that firmware
>> work for all 4355 variants, or only the CYW one? If only the CYW one, is
>> it possible to differentiate between them based on PCI revision ID? Note
>> that our 4355 has revision ID 12, and Apple specifically calls it 4355C1
>> (different chip revisions have different firmware builds, which is why I
>> named our firmware brcmfmac4355c1-pcie). If the CYW variant uses other
>> revision IDs that do not overlap, maybe we should have different
>> firmware entries for them with different masks.
>
>
> Can we make a separate table for the OTP Apple chips, something like here :-
>
> https://github.com/AdityaGarg8/linux/commit/fc41aac9283d2ba653a8b3191e8c0138c13d8ee1
I do not understand from this email thread why you would need separate
tables. Can you explain?
Regards,
Arend
Download attachment "smime.p7s" of type "application/pkcs7-signature" (4219 bytes)
Powered by blists - more mailing lists