[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <alpine.DEB.2.22.394.2301020955550.2536944@rhweight-WRK1>
Date: Mon, 2 Jan 2023 10:09:45 -0800 (PST)
From: matthew.gerlach@...ux.intel.com
To: Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@...ux.intel.com>
cc: Tom Rix <trix@...hat.com>, hao.wu@...el.com, yilun.xu@...el.com,
russell.h.weight@...el.com, basheer.ahmed.muddebihal@...el.com,
mdf@...nel.org, linux-fpga@...r.kernel.org,
linux-doc@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
tianfei.zhang@...el.com, corbet@....net,
gregkh@...uxfoundation.org, linux-serial@...r.kernel.org,
jirislaby@...nel.org, geert+renesas@...der.be,
niklas.soderlund+renesas@...natech.se, macro@...am.me.uk,
johan@...nel.org, lukas@...ner.de, ilpo.jarvinen@...ux.intel.com,
marpagan@...hat.com, bagasdotme@...il.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v8 3/4] fpga: dfl: add basic support for DFHv1
On Mon, 2 Jan 2023, Andy Shevchenko wrote:
> On Mon, Jan 02, 2023 at 07:27:06PM +0200, Andy Shevchenko wrote:
>> On Mon, Jan 02, 2023 at 08:54:48AM -0800, matthew.gerlach@...ux.intel.com wrote:
>>> On Thu, 29 Dec 2022, Andy Shevchenko wrote:
>>>> On Thu, Dec 29, 2022 at 08:18:03AM -0800, Tom Rix wrote:
>>>>> On 12/28/22 10:16 AM, matthew.gerlach@...ux.intel.com wrote:
>
> ...
>
>>>>>> + u64 params[];
>>>>> u64 *params
>>
>>>> This will break the overflow.h macros, no?
>>>> Besides that it will break the code for sure as it's not an equivalent.
>>
>>> I don't understand how this will break the overflow.h macros. The definition
>>> of struct dfl_feature_info and all of its uses are in a single file, dfl.c.
>>
>> Hint: __must_be_array()
>>
>> As I said, the proposed change is not acceptable since it's not an equivalent.
>
> Ah, you meant that there is no use of macros from overflow in the dfl.c?
> IIRC we discussed that some of the code may make use of them, or am I
> mistaken?
There currently is one usage of struct_size() from overflow.h in dfl.c,
and my patch adds another usage of struct_size(). struct dfl_feature_info
ends with a trailing array of u64.
I think the confusion is with struct dfl_feature and/or struct struct
dfl_device. Those structs don't end with a trailing array, and those
structs are not used with macros from overview.h.
Thanks for the feedback,
Matthew Gerlach
>
> --
> With Best Regards,
> Andy Shevchenko
>
>
>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists