[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20230103221852.22813-9-mario.limonciello@amd.com>
Date: Tue, 3 Jan 2023 16:18:27 -0600
From: Mario Limonciello <mario.limonciello@....com>
To: Alex Deucher <alexander.deucher@....com>,
<linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
CC: Javier Martinez Canillas <javierm@...hat.com>,
Carlos Soriano Sanchez <csoriano@...hat.com>,
<amd-gfx@...ts.freedesktop.org>, <dri-devel@...ts.freedesktop.org>,
David Airlie <airlied@...il.com>,
"Daniel Vetter" <daniel@...ll.ch>, <christian.koenig@....com>,
Lazar Lijo <Lijo.Lazar@....com>,
Mario Limonciello <mario.limonciello@....com>,
"Pan, Xinhui" <Xinhui.Pan@....com>
Subject: [PATCH v4 08/27] drm/amd: Make SDMA firmware load failures less noisy.
When firmware is missing we get failures at every step.
```
[ 3.855086] amdgpu 0000:04:00.0: Direct firmware load for amdgpu/green_sardine_sdma.bin failed with error -2
[ 3.855087] [drm:amdgpu_sdma_init_microcode [amdgpu]] *ERROR* SDMA: Failed to init firmware "amdgpu/green_sardine_sdma.bin"
[ 3.855398] [drm:sdma_v4_0_early_init [amdgpu]] *ERROR* Failed to load sdma firmware!
```
Realistically we don't need all of these, a user can tell from the first one
that request_firmware emitted what happened. Drop the others.
Signed-off-by: Mario Limonciello <mario.limonciello@....com>
---
v3->v4:
* New patch
---
drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_sdma.c | 4 +---
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 3 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_sdma.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_sdma.c
index 83e8f0dae647..f052173ef1e7 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_sdma.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_sdma.c
@@ -277,10 +277,8 @@ int amdgpu_sdma_init_microcode(struct amdgpu_device *adev,
}
out:
- if (err) {
- DRM_ERROR("SDMA: Failed to init firmware \"%s\"\n", fw_name);
+ if (err)
amdgpu_sdma_destroy_inst_ctx(adev, duplicate);
- }
return err;
}
--
2.34.1
Powered by blists - more mailing lists