[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <6ab14932-4b97-021c-4373-9a1aed86ac71@oracle.com>
Date: Tue, 3 Jan 2023 17:15:11 +0800
From: Anand Jain <anand.jain@...cle.com>
To: Tanmay Bhushan <007047221b@...il.com>, Chris Mason <clm@...com>,
Josef Bacik <josef@...icpanda.com>,
David Sterba <dsterba@...e.com>, linux-btrfs@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] btrfs: Fix ASSERT of em->len when getting extent
On 12/31/22 23:05, Tanmay Bhushan wrote:
> em->len is incorrectly asserted which is leading to it's
> assignment to sectorsize instead of being check for it.
>
> Signed-off-by: Tanmay Bhushan <007047221b@...il.com>
> ---
> fs/btrfs/inode.c | 2 +-
> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/fs/btrfs/inode.c b/fs/btrfs/inode.c
> index 8bcad9940154..e49358048a98 100644
> --- a/fs/btrfs/inode.c
> +++ b/fs/btrfs/inode.c
> @@ -7092,7 +7092,7 @@ struct extent_map *btrfs_get_extent(struct btrfs_inode *inode,
> * Other members are not utilized for inline extents.
> */
> ASSERT(em->block_start == EXTENT_MAP_INLINE);
> - ASSERT(em->len = fs_info->sectorsize);
> + ASSERT(em->len == fs_info->sectorsize);
Good catch.
Reviewed-by: Anand Jain <anand.jain@...cle.com>
>
> ret = read_inline_extent(inode, path, page);
> if (ret < 0)
Powered by blists - more mailing lists