linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v4 08/11] arm64: dts: qcom: sm8350: Use 2 interconnect cells

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Tue, 3 Jan 2023 10:26:50 +0100
From:   Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski@...aro.org>
To:     Robert Foss <robert.foss@...aro.org>
Cc:     robdclark@...il.com, quic_abhinavk@...cinc.com,
        dmitry.baryshkov@...aro.org, sean@...rly.run, airlied@...il.com,
        daniel@...ll.ch, robh+dt@...nel.org,
        krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@...aro.org, agross@...nel.org,
        andersson@...nel.org, konrad.dybcio@...ainline.org,
        quic_jesszhan@...cinc.com,
        angelogioacchino.delregno@...ainline.org, loic.poulain@...aro.org,
        vkoul@...nel.org, a39.skl@...il.com, quic_khsieh@...cinc.com,
        quic_vpolimer@...cinc.com, swboyd@...omium.org,
        dianders@...omium.org, liushixin2@...wei.com,
        linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org, dri-devel@...ts.freedesktop.org,
        freedreno@...ts.freedesktop.org, devicetree@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Jonathan Marek <jonathan@...ek.ca>,
        vinod.koul@...aro.org, Konrad Dybcio <konrad.dybcio@...aro.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 08/11] arm64: dts: qcom: sm8350: Use 2 interconnect
 cells

On 03/01/2023 10:24, Robert Foss wrote:
>>>> On which tree/revision did you base this?
>>>
>>> msm/drm-msm-display-for-6.2
>>
>> Then it is not a proper base for DTS changes - you will miss quite some
>> commits. The DTS patches should be based on Bjorn's SoC tree or
>> linux-next (although the latter sometimes can lead to conflicts).
> 
> Alright, then in that case this series needs to be split into 3 parts.
> 
> The dts fixes, remaining dts changes & the remainder of code.

The split of any fixes (or unrelated cleanups) is good idea anyway.
However code can go with DTS - just base on linux-next. If you do not
want to base on linux-next then splitting code from DTS is indeed one
more good way to send it.

> 
> Is this what you'd like to see?

Best regards,
Krzysztof