[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <Y7P1c4kZ3r2NrV6+@kuha.fi.intel.com>
Date: Tue, 3 Jan 2023 11:29:23 +0200
From: Heikki Krogerus <heikki.krogerus@...ux.intel.com>
To: Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@...ux.intel.com>
Cc: linux-usb@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v1 2/2] usb: typec: intel_pmc_mux: Deduplicate ACPI
matching in probe
On Mon, Jan 02, 2023 at 10:29:33PM +0200, Andy Shevchenko wrote:
> There is no need to call acpi_dev_present() followed by
> acpi_dev_get_first_match_dev() as they both do the same
> with only difference in the returning value. Instead,
> call the latter and check its result.
>
> Signed-off-by: Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@...ux.intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Heikki Krogerus <heikki.krogerus@...ux.intel.com>
> ---
> drivers/usb/typec/mux/intel_pmc_mux.c | 9 ++++-----
> 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/usb/typec/mux/intel_pmc_mux.c b/drivers/usb/typec/mux/intel_pmc_mux.c
> index 87e2c9130607..34e4188a40ff 100644
> --- a/drivers/usb/typec/mux/intel_pmc_mux.c
> +++ b/drivers/usb/typec/mux/intel_pmc_mux.c
> @@ -602,16 +602,15 @@ static int pmc_usb_probe_iom(struct pmc_usb *pmc)
> int ret;
>
> for (dev_id = &iom_acpi_ids[0]; dev_id->id[0]; dev_id++) {
> - if (acpi_dev_present(dev_id->id, NULL, -1)) {
> - pmc->iom_port_status_offset = (u32)dev_id->driver_data;
> - adev = acpi_dev_get_first_match_dev(dev_id->id, NULL, -1);
> + adev = acpi_dev_get_first_match_dev(dev_id->id, NULL, -1);
> + if (adev)
> break;
> - }
> }
> -
> if (!adev)
> return -ENODEV;
>
> + pmc->iom_port_status_offset = (u32)dev_id->driver_data;
> +
> INIT_LIST_HEAD(&resource_list);
> ret = acpi_dev_get_memory_resources(adev, &resource_list);
> if (ret < 0) {
> --
> 2.35.1
--
heikki
Powered by blists - more mailing lists