[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <Y7P5frCvcYOlzrbz@shell.armlinux.org.uk>
Date: Tue, 3 Jan 2023 09:46:38 +0000
From: "Russell King (Oracle)" <linux@...linux.org.uk>
To: Clark Wang <xiaoning.wang@....com>
Cc: peppe.cavallaro@...com, alexandre.torgue@...s.st.com,
joabreu@...opsys.com, davem@...emloft.net, edumazet@...gle.com,
kuba@...nel.org, pabeni@...hat.com, mcoquelin.stm32@...il.com,
andrew@...n.ch, hkallweit1@...il.com, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
linux-stm32@...md-mailman.stormreply.com,
linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] net: phylink: add a function to resume phy alone to
fix resume issue with WoL enabled
On Wed, Dec 21, 2022 at 04:01:43PM +0800, Clark Wang wrote:
> Issue we met:
> On some platforms, mac cannot work after resumed from the suspend with WoL
> enabled.
>
> The cause of the issue:
> 1. phylink_resolve() is in a workqueue which will not be executed immediately.
> This is the call sequence:
> phylink_resolve()->phylink_link_up()->pl->mac_ops->mac_link_up()
> For stmmac driver, mac_link_up() will set the correct speed/duplex...
> values which are from link_state.
> 2. In stmmac_resume(), it will call stmmac_hw_setup() after called the
> phylink_resume(), because mac need phy rx_clk to do the reset.
> stmmac_core_init() is called in function stmmac_hw_setup(), which will
> reset the mac and set the speed/duplex... to default value.
> Conclusion: Because phylink_resolve() cannot determine when it is called, it
> cannot be guaranteed to be called after stmmac_core_init().
> Once stmmac_core_init() is called after phylink_resolve(),
> the mac will be misconfigured and cannot be used.
>
> In order to avoid this problem, add a function called phylink_phy_resume()
> to resume phy separately. This eliminates the need to call phylink_resume()
> before stmmac_hw_setup().
>
> Add another judgement before called phy_start() in phylink_start(). This way
> phy_start() will not be called multiple times when resumes. At the same time,
> it may not affect other drivers that do not use phylink_phy_resume().
>
> Signed-off-by: Clark Wang <xiaoning.wang@....com>
> ---
> drivers/net/phy/phylink.c | 21 ++++++++++++++++++++-
> include/linux/phylink.h | 1 +
> 2 files changed, 21 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/net/phy/phylink.c b/drivers/net/phy/phylink.c
> index 09cc65c0da93..5bab59142579 100644
> --- a/drivers/net/phy/phylink.c
> +++ b/drivers/net/phy/phylink.c
> @@ -1939,7 +1939,7 @@ void phylink_start(struct phylink *pl)
> }
> if (poll)
> mod_timer(&pl->link_poll, jiffies + HZ);
> - if (pl->phydev)
> + if (pl->phydev && pl->phydev->state < PHY_UP)
I'm really not happy with this - not only does this subvert the checks in
phy_start(), it's a layering violation, and it delves into internals of
phylib in an unprotected way.
--
RMK's Patch system: https://www.armlinux.org.uk/developer/patches/
FTTP is here! 40Mbps down 10Mbps up. Decent connectivity at last!
Powered by blists - more mailing lists