linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH linux-next v2] s390/zcrypt: use strscpy() to instead of strncpy()

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <Y7P6mSuYkmP8g8Ot@osiris>
Date:   Tue, 3 Jan 2023 10:51:21 +0100
From:   Heiko Carstens <hca@...ux.ibm.com>
To:     yang.yang29@....com.cn
Cc:     freude@...ux.ibm.com, gor@...ux.ibm.com, agordeev@...ux.ibm.com,
        borntraeger@...ux.ibm.com, svens@...ux.ibm.com,
        linux-s390@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        xu.panda@....com.cn
Subject: Re: [PATCH linux-next v2] s390/zcrypt: use strscpy() to instead of
 strncpy()

On Tue, Jan 03, 2023 at 10:02:07AM +0800, yang.yang29@....com.cn wrote:
> From: Yang Yang <yang.yang29@....com>
> 
> The implementation of strscpy() is more robust and safer.
> That's now the recommended way to copy NUL-terminated strings.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Yang Yang <yang.yang29@....com>
> Signed-off-by: Xu Panda <xu.panda@....com.cn>
> ---
> chang for v2
>  - match the FROM with the Email

You sent this from yang.yang29@....com.cn, but the sign-off is without the
".cn" suffix. Can you please make sure that your sign-off chain actually
follows the rules as outlined in Documentation/process/submitting-patches.rst?

If you read that then the sign-off line from Xu Panda shouldn't be there,
since the patch was not authored or routed via Xu Panda.