[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <30423568-df03-1d72-81fe-3a4b33214e5c@linaro.org>
Date: Tue, 3 Jan 2023 12:28:11 +0100
From: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski@...aro.org>
To: Aradhya Bhatia <a-bhatia1@...com>,
Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@...aro.org>,
Tomi Valkeinen <tomba@...nel.org>,
Jyri Sarha <jyri.sarha@....fi>,
David Airlie <airlied@...il.com>,
Daniel Vetter <daniel@...ll.ch>,
Laurent Pinchart <laurent.pinchart@...asonboard.com>,
Thierry Reding <thierry.reding@...il.com>,
Sam Ravnborg <sam@...nborg.org>,
Maxime Ripard <maxime@...no.tech>,
Liam Girdwood <lgirdwood@...il.com>,
Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>,
Lad Prabhakar <prabhakar.mahadev-lad.rj@...renesas.com>,
Paul Walmsley <paul.walmsley@...ive.com>,
Palmer Dabbelt <palmer@...belt.com>,
Albert Ou <aou@...s.berkeley.edu>,
Matthias Brugger <matthias.bgg@...il.com>,
Guo Ren <guoren@...nel.org>
Cc: DRI Development List <dri-devel@...ts.freedesktop.org>,
Devicetree List <devicetree@...r.kernel.org>,
Linux Kernel List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Linux RISC-V List <linux-riscv@...ts.infradead.org>,
Linux ARM Kernel List <linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
Linux Mediatek List <linux-mediatek@...ts.infradead.org>,
Linux C-SKY Arch List <linux-csky@...r.kernel.org>,
Nishanth Menon <nm@...com>,
Vignesh Raghavendra <vigneshr@...com>,
Rahul T R <r-ravikumar@...com>,
Devarsh Thakkar <devarsht@...com>,
Jai Luthra <j-luthra@...com>,
Jayesh Choudhary <j-choudhary@...com>
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH 3/4] dt-bindings: panel: Introduce dual-link LVDS
panel
On 03/01/2023 12:02, Aradhya Bhatia wrote:
> But this is throwing an error. I am confused what else could be done.
> Can you please suggest what might be a more accurate check here?
>
>>
>>> + required:
>>> + - dual-lvds-odd-pixels
>>> + then:
>>> + properties:
>>> + port@1:
>>> + properties:
>>> + dual-lvds-even-pixels: true
>>> + dual-lvds-odd-pixels: false
>>
>> Why do you need this? Your oneOf before already solves it.
>
> I agree with your comment here. It makes sense to only have
>
> dual-lvds-even-pixels: true
>
> and have the oneOf condition take care of the other. But, I just tested
> this and it was unable to pick-up this intentionally-added error.
>
> I added 'dual-lvds-odd-pixels' property to both the nodes, and
> dt_binding_check passes successfully (which it should have not.)
>
> Instead, if I only keep this,
>
> dual-lvds-odd-pixels: false
>
> then the dt_binding_check detects the error as it should.
>
> Regardless, I am curious why the first method doesn't work. Will try to
> explore more on that.
The check for presence of properties is only against required:, but you
added there properties. Like this:
https://elixir.bootlin.com/linux/v5.17-rc2/source/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/mfd/samsung,s5m8767.yaml#L155
Other way is to drop your both oneOf and entire allOf from ports and use:
oneOf:
- properties:
ports:
$ref: /schemas/graph.yaml#/properties/ports
properties:
port@0:
required:
- dual-lvds-odd-pixels
port@1:
required:
- dual-lvds-even-pixels
- properties:
ports:
$ref: /schemas/graph.yaml#/properties/ports
properties:
port@1:
required:
- dual-lvds-odd-pixels
port@0:
required:
- dual-lvds-even-pixels
Best regards,
Krzysztof
Powered by blists - more mailing lists