linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v2 02/11] dt-bindings: nvmem: Fix qcom,qfprom compatibles enum ordering

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <d3688dc6-d869-b313-3849-b07043a3c064@collabora.com>
Date:   Tue, 3 Jan 2023 12:59:26 +0100
From:   AngeloGioacchino Del Regno 
        <angelogioacchino.delregno@...labora.com>
To:     Srinivas Kandagatla <srinivas.kandagatla@...aro.org>,
        Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski@...aro.org>,
        agross@...nel.org
Cc:     andersson@...nel.org, konrad.dybcio@...aro.org, robh+dt@...nel.org,
        krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@...aro.org, jassisinghbrar@...il.com,
        jic23@...nel.org, lars@...afoo.de, keescook@...omium.org,
        tony.luck@...el.com, gpiccoli@...lia.com, evgreen@...omium.org,
        gregkh@...uxfoundation.org, a39.skl@...il.com,
        linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org, devicetree@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-iio@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-hardening@...r.kernel.org, marijn.suijten@...ainline.org,
        kernel@...labora.com, luca@...tu.xyz
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 02/11] dt-bindings: nvmem: Fix qcom,qfprom compatibles
 enum ordering

Il 03/01/23 12:58, Srinivas Kandagatla ha scritto:
> 
> 
> On 16/11/2022 08:50, AngeloGioacchino Del Regno wrote:
>> Il 15/11/22 17:42, Krzysztof Kozlowski ha scritto:
>>> On 11/11/2022 13:01, AngeloGioacchino Del Regno wrote:
>>>> Move qcom,msm8974-qfprom after qcom,msm8916-qfprom to respect
>>>> alphabetical ordering.
>>>>
>>>> Fixes: c8b336bb1aeb ("dt-bindings: nvmem: Add soc qfprom compatible strings")
>>>
>>> It's a style, code readability, but not a bug. I propose to drop the tag.
>>>
>>> With that:
>>> Reviewed-by: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski@...aro.org>
>>>
>>>
>>
>> Should I send a v3, or is it possible to drop the tag while applying it?
> 
> Applied after dropping fixes tag..
> 

Thanks for that!

Cheers,
Angelo