[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <fcc4116a-e4cd-9542-60a6-905a4968e6ca@huawei.com>
Date: Tue, 3 Jan 2023 09:58:36 +0800
From: Kefeng Wang <wangkefeng.wang@...wei.com>
To: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
CC: <linux-mm@...ck.org>, <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
<willy@...radead.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] mm: huge_memory: convert split_huge_pages_all() to use
a folio
On 2022/12/31 5:45, Andrew Morton wrote:
> On Fri, 30 Dec 2022 17:30:20 +0800 Kefeng Wang <wangkefeng.wang@...wei.com> wrote:
>
>> Straightforwardly convert split_huge_pages_all() to use a folio.
>>
>> ...
>>
>> --- a/mm/huge_memory.c
>> +++ b/mm/huge_memory.c
>> @@ -2932,6 +2932,7 @@ static void split_huge_pages_all(void)
>> {
>> struct zone *zone;
>> struct page *page;
>> + struct folio *folio;
>> unsigned long pfn, max_zone_pfn;
>> unsigned long total = 0, split = 0;
>>
>> @@ -2944,24 +2945,32 @@ static void split_huge_pages_all(void)
>> int nr_pages;
>>
>> page = pfn_to_online_page(pfn);
>> - if (!page || !get_page_unless_zero(page))
>> + if (!page || PageTail(page))
>> + continue;
>> + folio = page_folio(page);
>> + if (!folio_try_get(folio))
>> continue;
>>
>> - if (zone != page_zone(page))
>> + if (unlikely(page_folio(page) != folio))
>> + goto next;
>> +
>> + if (zone != folio_zone(folio))
>> goto next;
>
> I'm still not understanding the above hunk. Why is the
> "page_folio(page) != folio" check added? Should it be commented?
There is a comment in try_get_folio(), is it enough?
Powered by blists - more mailing lists