lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <d4dfbe31-cef2-087b-0c7d-b484feeba097@redhat.com>
Date:   Tue, 3 Jan 2023 08:35:09 +0800
From:   Xiubo Li <xiubli@...hat.com>
To:     Ilya Dryomov <idryomov@...il.com>
Cc:     jlayton@...nel.org, ceph-devel@...r.kernel.org,
        mchangir@...hat.com, lhenriques@...e.de, viro@...iv.linux.org.uk,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 0/2] ceph: fix the use-after-free bug for file_lock


On 02/01/2023 19:50, Ilya Dryomov wrote:
> On Wed, Dec 14, 2022 at 4:35 AM <xiubli@...hat.com> wrote:
>> From: Xiubo Li <xiubli@...hat.com>
>>
>> Changed in V5:
>> - s/fl_inode/inode/
>>
>> Changed in V4:
>> - repeat the afs in fs.h instead of adding ceph specific header file
>>
>> Changed in V3:
>> - switched to vfs_inode_has_locks() helper to fix another ceph file lock
>> bug, thanks Jeff!
>> - this patch series is based on Jeff's previous VFS lock patch:
>>    https://patchwork.kernel.org/project/ceph-devel/list/?series=695950
>>
>> Changed in V2:
>> - switch to file_lock.fl_u to fix the race bug
>> - and the most code will be in the ceph layer
>>
>>
>> Xiubo Li (2):
>>    ceph: switch to vfs_inode_has_locks() to fix file lock bug
>>    ceph: add ceph specific member support for file_lock
>>
>>   fs/ceph/caps.c     |  2 +-
>>   fs/ceph/locks.c    | 24 ++++++++++++++++++------
>>   fs/ceph/super.h    |  1 -
>>   include/linux/fs.h |  3 +++
>>   4 files changed, 22 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)
>>
>> --
>> 2.31.1
>>
> Hi Xiubo,
>
> I have adjusted the title of the second patch to actually reflect its
> purpose: "ceph: avoid use-after-free in ceph_fl_release_lock()".  With
> that:
>
> Reviewed-by: Ilya Dryomov <idryomov@...il.com>

Hi Ilya,

Sure. Looks better.

I will revise it.

Thanks

- Xiubo


> Thanks,
>
>                  Ilya
>

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ