linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 2/3] memory: atmel-sdramc: remove the driver

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Tue, 3 Jan 2023 14:29:13 +0000
From:   <Claudiu.Beznea@...rochip.com>
To:     <krzysztof.kozlowski@...aro.org>, <mturquette@...libre.com>,
        <sboyd@...nel.org>, <Nicolas.Ferre@...rochip.com>,
        <alexandre.belloni@...tlin.com>
CC:     <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, <linux-clk@...r.kernel.org>,
        <linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/3] memory: atmel-sdramc: remove the driver

On 03.01.2023 15:17, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
> EXTERNAL EMAIL: Do not click links or open attachments unless you know the content is safe
> 
> On 03/01/2023 13:45, Claudiu.Beznea@...rochip.com wrote:
> 
>>>>> Uh, why does it depend? I understood the changset is bisectable and
>>>>> removal of unneeded driver will happen later. Otherwise it is not
>>>>> bisectable...
>>>>
>>>> AT91 devices will fail to boot if this patch is applied and 1/3 is not
>>>> there. This is because clock framework will disable DDR clocks because
>>>> there will be no consumer for them.
>>>
>>> This I understand, but why do you need this patch to be able to apply
>>> 1/3?
>>
>> To avoid having AT91 devices failing to boot in case your tree (containing
>> this patch) is merged  first.
> 
> But this patch is not going to be merged first. It will wait one more
> cycle, so the dependency is there.

OK. All good this way.

Thank you,
Claudiu

> 
> If you need to make it in one cycle for some reason, then I would need
> stable tag with the clock patch.
> 
> Best regards,
> Krzysztof
>