[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <87fscrd5os.fsf@jogness.linutronix.de>
Date: Tue, 03 Jan 2023 16:06:03 +0106
From: John Ogness <john.ogness@...utronix.de>
To: Petr Mladek <pmladek@...e.com>
Cc: Sergey Senozhatsky <senozhatsky@...omium.org>,
Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH printk v3 6/6] printk: introduce
console_prepend_dropped() for dropped messages
On 2023-01-03, Petr Mladek <pmladek@...e.com> wrote:
>> Actually, I would like to rename all of those limit macros to something
>> that makes more sense for the new code base:
>>
>> CONSOLE_EXT_LOG_MAX -> CONSOLE_MESSAGE_MAX
>>
>> CONSOLE_LOG_MAX -> SYSLOG_MESSAGE_MAX
>
> Heh, we actually do not need this. The size of @scratchbuf
> might be LOG_LINE_MAX/PRINTK_RECORD_MAX. The scratch buffer
> is newly used only to read the plain message. The prefixes
> are added to @outbuf.
>
>> LOG_LINE_MAX -> PRINTK_RECORD_MAX
The scratch buffer would become PRINTK_RECORD_MAX, but we still need
SYSLOG_MESSAGE_MAX for the kmalloc's syslog buffers. Unless you think it
is OK to kmalloc 8KB instead of 1KB for the syslog calls. Then yes, we
do not need SYSLOG_MESSAGE_MAX.
John
Powered by blists - more mailing lists