[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <310913b0a92bd06b93ede9e01e3f99cb5bce4e7a.camel@linux.ibm.com>
Date: Tue, 03 Jan 2023 17:03:23 +0100
From: Niklas Schnelle <schnelle@...ux.ibm.com>
To: Joerg Roedel <joro@...tes.org>, Will Deacon <will@...nel.org>,
Robin Murphy <robin.murphy@....com>,
Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@...dia.com>,
Wenjia Zhang <wenjia@...ux.ibm.com>
Cc: Matthew Rosato <mjrosato@...ux.ibm.com>,
Gerd Bayer <gbayer@...ux.ibm.com>,
Pierre Morel <pmorel@...ux.ibm.com>, iommu@...ts.linux.dev,
linux-s390@...r.kernel.org, borntraeger@...ux.ibm.com,
hca@...ux.ibm.com, gor@...ux.ibm.com,
gerald.schaefer@...ux.ibm.com, agordeev@...ux.ibm.com,
svens@...ux.ibm.com, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Julian Ruess <julianr@...ux.ibm.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 2/7] iommu: Allow .iotlb_sync_map to fail and handle
s390's -ENOMEM return
On Mon, 2023-01-02 at 12:56 +0100, Niklas Schnelle wrote:
> On s390 .iotlb_sync_map is used to sync mappings to an underlying
> hypervisor by letting the hypervisor inspect the synced IOVA range and
> updating its shadow table. This however means that it can fail as the
> hypervisor may run out of resources. This can be due to the hypervisor
> being unable to pin guest pages, due to a limit on concurrently mapped
> addresses such as vfio_iommu_type1.dma_entry_limit or other resources.
> Either way such a failure to sync a mapping should result in
> a DMA_MAPPING_EROR.
>
> Now especially when running with batched IOTLB flushes for unmap it may
> be that some IOVAs have already been invalidated but not yet synced via
> .iotlb_sync_map. Thus if the hypervisor indicates running out of
> resources, first do a global flush allowing the hypervisor to free
> resources associated with these mappings and only if that also fails
> report this error to callers.
>
> Signed-off-by: Niklas Schnelle <schnelle@...ux.ibm.com>
> ---
> drivers/iommu/amd/iommu.c | 5 +++--
> drivers/iommu/apple-dart.c | 5 +++--
> drivers/iommu/intel/iommu.c | 5 +++--
> drivers/iommu/iommu.c | 20 ++++++++++++++++----
> drivers/iommu/msm_iommu.c | 5 +++--
> drivers/iommu/mtk_iommu.c | 5 +++--
> drivers/iommu/s390-iommu.c | 29 ++++++++++++++++++++++++-----
> drivers/iommu/sprd-iommu.c | 5 +++--
> drivers/iommu/tegra-gart.c | 5 +++--
> include/linux/iommu.h | 4 ++--
> 10 files changed, 63 insertions(+), 25 deletions(-)
Ok kernel test robot reported that I missed an implementation of
.iotlb_sync_map in drivers/iommu/sun50i-iommu.c during rebase as that
was only added in v6.2-rc1 by commit e563cc0c787c85 ("iommu/sun50i:
Implement .iotlb_sync_map"). Will add and send a v4 including the
proposed commit message rewording too.
>
> diff --git a/drivers/iommu/amd/iommu.c b/drivers/iommu/amd/iommu.c
> index cbeaab55c0db..3df7d20e0e52 100644
> --- a/drivers/iommu/amd/iommu.c
> +++ b/drivers/iommu/amd/iommu.c
> @@ -2180,14 +2180,15 @@ static int amd_iommu_attach_device(struct iommu_domain *dom,
> return ret;
> }
>
> -static void amd_iommu_iotlb_sync_map(struct iommu_domain *dom,
> - unsigned long iova, size_t size)
---8<---
Powered by blists - more mailing lists