[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAHmME9ohJ3JZNjkxuA0KjFW0LLQksgQP5f8bfrogd3+GmLrpKw@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 3 Jan 2023 18:30:52 +0100
From: "Jason A. Donenfeld" <Jason@...c4.com>
To: Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>
Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
patches@...ts.linux.dev, tglx@...utronix.de,
linux-crypto@...r.kernel.org, linux-api@...r.kernel.org,
x86@...nel.org, Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
Adhemerval Zanella Netto <adhemerval.zanella@...aro.org>,
"Carlos O'Donell" <carlos@...hat.com>,
Florian Weimer <fweimer@...hat.com>,
Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>, Jann Horn <jannh@...gle.com>,
Christian Brauner <brauner@...nel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v14 1/7] x86: lib: Separate instruction decoder MMIO type
from MMIO trace
On Tue, Jan 3, 2023 at 6:29 PM Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de> wrote:
>
> On Tue, Jan 03, 2023 at 06:00:46PM +0100, Ingo Molnar wrote:
> > > I guess you missed the conversation with Borislav yesterday about that.
> > > He mentioned that I'd just take it through random.git when this whole
> > > series goes in.
> >
> > Please base your tree off on tip:x86/asm then (or pull it in) - it only
>
> My idea was a lot simpler: avoid the tree inter-dependency by us acking this
> patch so that it can go through the random.git tree.
Indeed I would prefer this.
Or... just put this in 6.2 because it's trivial anyway? Heck, even
mark it as stable@ so make future backporting easier. Then it'll meet
tip's urgent criteria.
Jason
Powered by blists - more mailing lists