[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <bcce507a31662004262fa3bbe911f1b1ff7f27af.camel@icenowy.me>
Date: Wed, 04 Jan 2023 17:27:53 +0800
From: Icenowy Zheng <uwu@...nowy.me>
To: Guo Ren <guoren@...nel.org>
Cc: Paul Walmsley <paul.walmsley@...ive.com>,
Palmer Dabbelt <palmer@...belt.com>,
Albert Ou <aou@...s.berkeley.edu>,
Heiko Stuebner <heiko@...ech.de>,
Samuel Holland <samuel@...lland.org>,
Conor Dooley <conor.dooley@...rochip.com>,
linux-riscv@...ts.infradead.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH 2/3] riscv: use VA+PA variant of CMO macros for DMA
synchorization
在 2023-01-04星期三的 17:24 +0800,Guo Ren写道:
> On Wed, Jan 4, 2023 at 4:59 PM Icenowy Zheng <uwu@...nowy.me> wrote:
> >
> > 在 2023-01-04星期三的 16:50 +0800,Guo Ren写道:
> > > On Wed, Jan 4, 2023 at 3:43 PM Icenowy Zheng <uwu@...nowy.me>
> > > wrote:
> > > >
> > > > DMA synchorization is done on PA and the VA is calculated from
> > > > the
> > > > PA.
> > > >
> > > > Use the alternative macro variant that takes both VA and PA as
> > > > parameters, thus in case the ISA extension used support PA
> > > > directly, the
> > > > overhead for re-converting VA to PA can be omitted.
> > > >
> > > > Suggested-by: Guo Ren <guoren@...nel.org>
> > > > Signed-off-by: Icenowy Zheng <uwu@...nowy.me>
> > > > ---
> > > > arch/riscv/mm/dma-noncoherent.c | 8 ++++----
> > > > 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
> > > >
> > > > diff --git a/arch/riscv/mm/dma-noncoherent.c
> > > > b/arch/riscv/mm/dma-
> > > > noncoherent.c
> > > > index d919efab6eba..a751f4aece62 100644
> > > > --- a/arch/riscv/mm/dma-noncoherent.c
> > > > +++ b/arch/riscv/mm/dma-noncoherent.c
> > > > @@ -19,13 +19,13 @@ void arch_sync_dma_for_device(phys_addr_t
> > > > paddr, size_t size,
> > > >
> > > > switch (dir) {
> > > > case DMA_TO_DEVICE:
> > > > - ALT_CMO_OP(clean, vaddr, size,
> > > > riscv_cbom_block_size);
> > > > + ALT_CMO_OP_VPA(clean, vaddr, paddr, size,
> > > > riscv_cbom_block_size);
> > > ALT_CMO_OP -> ALT_CMO_OP_VPA, is the renaming necessary?
> >
> > I didn't rename the original ALT_CMO_OP, ALT_CMO_OP_VPA is
> > something
> > new.
> The ##_VPA is really strange.
>
> How about:
> ALT_CMO_OP -> ALT_CMO_OP_VA
> ALT_CMO_OP_VPA -> ALT_CMO_OP
It's thus a much bigger change.
If you are not fond of _VPA, I can rename it to _VA_PA.
>
> >
> > >
> > > Others:
> > > Reviewed-by: Guo Ren <guoren@...nel.org>
> > >
> > > > break;
> > > > case DMA_FROM_DEVICE:
> > > > - ALT_CMO_OP(clean, vaddr, size,
> > > > riscv_cbom_block_size);
> > > > + ALT_CMO_OP_VPA(clean, vaddr, paddr, size,
> > > > riscv_cbom_block_size);
> > > > break;
> > > > case DMA_BIDIRECTIONAL:
> > > > - ALT_CMO_OP(flush, vaddr, size,
> > > > riscv_cbom_block_size);
> > > > + ALT_CMO_OP_VPA(flush, vaddr, paddr, size,
> > > > riscv_cbom_block_size);
> > > > break;
> > > > default:
> > > > break;
> > > > @@ -42,7 +42,7 @@ void arch_sync_dma_for_cpu(phys_addr_t paddr,
> > > > size_t size,
> > > > break;
> > > > case DMA_FROM_DEVICE:
> > > > case DMA_BIDIRECTIONAL:
> > > > - ALT_CMO_OP(flush, vaddr, size,
> > > > riscv_cbom_block_size);
> > > > + ALT_CMO_OP_VPA(flush, vaddr, paddr, size,
> > > > riscv_cbom_block_size);
> > > > break;
> > > > default:
> > > > break;
> > > > --
> > > > 2.38.1
> > > >
> > >
> > >
> >
>
>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists