linux-kernel - [PATCH] rcu: Rework tick dependency setting into rcu_exp

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <20230104114722.931144-1-qiang1.zhang@intel.com>
Date:   Wed,  4 Jan 2023 19:47:22 +0800
From:   Zqiang <qiang1.zhang@...el.com>
To:     paulmck@...nel.org, frederic@...nel.org, quic_neeraju@...cinc.com,
        joelfernandes.org@...r.kernel.org
Cc:     rcu@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH] rcu: Rework tick dependency setting into rcu_exp_handler()

Currently, when first find out the expedited grace period is not end
and timeout occurred, we set tick dependency for CPUs that have not
yet reported the quiescent state in the rcu_node structure's->expmask
but need to eliminate races between set and clear tick dependency, setting
CPU tick dependency need to hold rcu_node structure's->lock.

This commit move tick dependency setting into rcu_exp_handler(), set tick
dependency when fail to report a quiescent state and clear tick dependency
in rcu_report_exp_rdp(). [from Frederic Weisbecker suggestion]

Signed-off-by: Zqiang <qiang1.zhang@...el.com>
---
 kernel/rcu/tree_exp.h | 42 +++++++++++++++++-------------------------
 1 file changed, 17 insertions(+), 25 deletions(-)

diff --git a/kernel/rcu/tree_exp.h b/kernel/rcu/tree_exp.h
index 7cc4856da081..02605048830c 100644
--- a/kernel/rcu/tree_exp.h
+++ b/kernel/rcu/tree_exp.h
@@ -586,39 +586,19 @@ static bool synchronize_rcu_expedited_wait_once(long tlimit)
 static void synchronize_rcu_expedited_wait(void)
 {
 	int cpu;
-	unsigned long j;
 	unsigned long jiffies_stall;
 	unsigned long jiffies_start;
 	unsigned long mask;
 	int ndetected;
-	struct rcu_data *rdp;
 	struct rcu_node *rnp;
 	struct rcu_node *rnp_root = rcu_get_root();
-	unsigned long flags;
 
 	trace_rcu_exp_grace_period(rcu_state.name, rcu_exp_gp_seq_endval(), TPS("startwait"));
 	jiffies_stall = rcu_exp_jiffies_till_stall_check();
 	jiffies_start = jiffies;
-	if (tick_nohz_full_enabled() && rcu_inkernel_boot_has_ended()) {
-		if (synchronize_rcu_expedited_wait_once(1))
-			return;
-		rcu_for_each_leaf_node(rnp) {
-			raw_spin_lock_irqsave_rcu_node(rnp, flags);
-			mask = READ_ONCE(rnp->expmask);
-			for_each_leaf_node_cpu_mask(rnp, cpu, mask) {
-				rdp = per_cpu_ptr(&rcu_data, cpu);
-				if (rdp->rcu_forced_tick_exp)
-					continue;
-				rdp->rcu_forced_tick_exp = true;
-				if (cpu_online(cpu))
-					tick_dep_set_cpu(cpu, TICK_DEP_BIT_RCU_EXP);
-			}
-			raw_spin_unlock_irqrestore_rcu_node(rnp, flags);
-		}
-		j = READ_ONCE(jiffies_till_first_fqs);
-		if (synchronize_rcu_expedited_wait_once(j + HZ))
-			return;
-	}
+
+	if (synchronize_rcu_expedited_wait_once(1))
+		return;
 
 	for (;;) {
 		if (synchronize_rcu_expedited_wait_once(jiffies_stall))
@@ -653,8 +633,6 @@ static void synchronize_rcu_expedited_wait(void)
 		if (ndetected) {
 			pr_err("blocking rcu_node structures (internal RCU debug):");
 			rcu_for_each_node_breadth_first(rnp) {
-				if (rnp == rnp_root)
-					continue; /* printed unconditionally */
 				if (sync_rcu_exp_done_unlocked(rnp))
 					continue;
 				pr_cont(" l=%u:%d-%d:%#lx/%c",
@@ -729,6 +707,17 @@ static void rcu_exp_sel_wait_wake(unsigned long s)
 
 #ifdef CONFIG_PREEMPT_RCU
 
+static void rcu_exp_set_tickdep(int cpu)
+{
+	struct rcu_data *rdp = per_cpu_ptr(&rcu_data, cpu);
+
+	if (tick_nohz_full_enabled() && rcu_inkernel_boot_has_ended() &&
+						cpu_online(cpu)) {
+		rdp->rcu_forced_tick_exp = true;
+		tick_dep_set_cpu(cpu, TICK_DEP_BIT_RCU_EXP);
+	}
+}
+
 /*
  * Remote handler for smp_call_function_single().  If there is an
  * RCU read-side critical section in effect, request that the
@@ -743,6 +732,7 @@ static void rcu_exp_handler(void *unused)
 	struct rcu_data *rdp = this_cpu_ptr(&rcu_data);
 	struct rcu_node *rnp = rdp->mynode;
 	struct task_struct *t = current;
+	int cpu = raw_smp_processor_id();
 
 	/*
 	 * First, the common case of not being in an RCU read-side
@@ -757,6 +747,7 @@ static void rcu_exp_handler(void *unused)
 			WRITE_ONCE(rdp->cpu_no_qs.b.exp, true);
 			set_tsk_need_resched(t);
 			set_preempt_need_resched();
+			rcu_exp_set_tickdep(cpu);
 		}
 		return;
 	}
@@ -778,6 +769,7 @@ static void rcu_exp_handler(void *unused)
 		if (rnp->expmask & rdp->grpmask) {
 			WRITE_ONCE(rdp->cpu_no_qs.b.exp, true);
 			t->rcu_read_unlock_special.b.exp_hint = true;
+			rcu_exp_set_tickdep(cpu);
 		}
 		raw_spin_unlock_irqrestore_rcu_node(rnp, flags);
 		return;
-- 
2.25.1