[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <Y7VuFJFUHtkqA9ZM@ziepe.ca>
Date: Wed, 4 Jan 2023 08:16:20 -0400
From: Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@...pe.ca>
To: Niklas Schnelle <schnelle@...ux.ibm.com>
Cc: Alex Williamson <alex.williamson@...hat.com>,
Cornelia Huck <cohuck@...hat.com>, kvm@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-s390@...r.kernel.org,
Matthew Rosato <mjrosato@...ux.ibm.com>,
Pierre Morel <pmorel@...ux.ibm.com>,
Christian Bornträger <borntraeger@...ux.ibm.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/1] vfio/type1: Respect IOMMU reserved regions in
vfio_test_domain_fgsp()
On Wed, Jan 04, 2023 at 10:52:55AM +0100, Niklas Schnelle wrote:
> The problem manifests only with ISM devices which are a special s390
> virtual PCI device that is implemented in the machine hypervisor. This
> device is used for high speed cross-LPAR (Logical Partition)
> communication, basically it allows two LPARs that previously exchanged
> an authentication token to memcpy between their partitioned memory
> using the virtual device. For copying a receiving LPAR will IOMMU map a
> region of memory for the ISM device that it will allow DMAing into
> (memcpy by the hypervisor). All other regions remain unmapped and thus
> inaccessible. In preparation the device emulation in the machine
> hypervisor intercepts the IOTLB flush and looks at the IOMMU
> translation tables performing e.g. size and alignment checks I presume,
> one of these checks against the start/end DMA boundaries. This check
> fails which leads to the virtual ISM device being put into an error
> state. Being in an error state it then fails to be initialized by the
> guest driver later on.
You could rephrase this as saying that the S390 map operation doesn't
check for bounds so mapping in a reserved region doesn't fail, but
errors the HW.
Which seems reasonable to me
Jason
Powered by blists - more mailing lists