linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] media: i2c: imx258: Parse and register properties

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <62b0d46f-7962-ad5f-dd4e-5820d76964b4@collabora.com>
Date:   Wed, 4 Jan 2023 13:47:00 +0100
From:   Robert Mader <robert.mader@...labora.com>
To:     Sakari Ailus <sakari.ailus@...ux.intel.com>,
        Jacopo Mondi <jacopo.mondi@...asonboard.com>
Cc:     linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, nicholas@...hemail.net,
        javierm@...hat.com, Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab@...nel.org>,
        linux-media@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] media: i2c: imx258: Parse and register properties

Sure, makes sense!

Send out v2 now.

On 04.01.23 08:21, Sakari Ailus wrote:
> Hi Jacopo, Robert,
>
> On Tue, Jan 03, 2023 at 06:16:24PM +0100, Jacopo Mondi wrote:
>> Hi Robert
>>
>> On Tue, Jan 03, 2023 at 03:11:44PM +0100, Robert Mader wrote:
>>> On 02.01.23 15:06, Jacopo Mondi wrote:
>>>> Hi Robert
>>>>
>>>> On Sun, Dec 25, 2022 at 04:42:34PM +0100, Robert Mader wrote:
>>>>> Analogous to e.g. the imx219. This enables propagating
>>>>> V4L2_CID_CAMERA_SENSOR_ROTATION values so that libcamera
>>>>> can detect the correct rotation from the device tree
>>>>> and propagate it further to e.g. Pipewire.
>>>>>
>>>>> Signed-off-by: Robert Mader <robert.mader@...labora.com>
>>>>> ---
>>>>>    drivers/media/i2c/imx258.c | 13 ++++++++++++-
>>>>>    1 file changed, 12 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>>>>>
>>>>> diff --git a/drivers/media/i2c/imx258.c b/drivers/media/i2c/imx258.c
>>>>> index eab5fc1ee2f7..85819043d1e3 100644
>>>>> --- a/drivers/media/i2c/imx258.c
>>>>> +++ b/drivers/media/i2c/imx258.c
>>>>> @@ -9,6 +9,7 @@
>>>>>    #include <linux/pm_runtime.h>
>>>>>    #include <media/v4l2-ctrls.h>
>>>>>    #include <media/v4l2-device.h>
>>>>> +#include <media/v4l2-fwnode.h>
>>>>>    #include <asm/unaligned.h>
>>>>>
>>>>>    #define IMX258_REG_VALUE_08BIT		1
>>>>> @@ -1149,6 +1150,7 @@ static int imx258_init_controls(struct imx258 *imx258)
>>>>>    {
>>>>>    	struct i2c_client *client = v4l2_get_subdevdata(&imx258->sd);
>>>>>    	struct v4l2_ctrl_handler *ctrl_hdlr;
>>>>> +	struct v4l2_fwnode_device_properties props;
>>>> Might be nicer to move this one line up
>>>   Can you say what's your reasoning? I personally slightly prefer
>>> alphabetical order, but no strong opinion :)
>>>
>> I've often been instructed to try to respect the inverse-xmas-tree
> I'd advise the same, unless there are other reasons to arrange the lines
> differently.
>