linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v5 0/2] docs: Integrate rustdoc into Rust documentation

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Wed, 04 Jan 2023 07:53:35 -0700
From:   Jonathan Corbet <corbet@....net>
To:     Miguel Ojeda <miguel.ojeda.sandonis@...il.com>
Cc:     Carlos Bilbao <carlos.bilbao@....com>, ojeda@...nel.org,
        akiyks@...il.com, jani.nikula@...ux.intel.com,
        rdunlap@...radead.org, linux-doc@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, konstantin@...uxfoundation.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 0/2] docs: Integrate rustdoc into Rust documentation

Miguel Ojeda <miguel.ojeda.sandonis@...il.com> writes:

> I think I understand now what you meant by "fail more gracefully". I
> thought you meant fail with a better/proper message given versioning
> information or similar, but you primarily meant avoid breaking the
> entire docs build if the Rust part fails, right?

Both would be nice, but not breaking the docs build would be at the top
of my list.

Thanks,

jon