linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 2/4] rtw88: Configure the registers from rtw_bf

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <CAFBinCD-ygjiGuqMgHEBjfr_U67JrqHE7oxNGvT5zhCtgetK7g@mail.gmail.com>
Date:   Wed, 4 Jan 2023 16:43:52 +0100
From:   Martin Blumenstingl <martin.blumenstingl@...glemail.com>
To:     Ping-Ke Shih <pkshih@...ltek.com>
Cc:     "linux-wireless@...r.kernel.org" <linux-wireless@...r.kernel.org>,
        "kvalo@...nel.org" <kvalo@...nel.org>,
        "s.hauer@...gutronix.de" <s.hauer@...gutronix.de>,
        "tony0620emma@...il.com" <tony0620emma@...il.com>,
        "netdev@...r.kernel.org" <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
        "linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/4] rtw88: Configure the registers from rtw_bf_assoc()
 outside the RCU lock

Hi Ping-Ke,

On Fri, Dec 30, 2022 at 12:48 AM Ping-Ke Shih <pkshih@...ltek.com> wrote:
[...]
> > Reviewed-by: Ping-Ke Shih <pkshih@...ltek.com>
> > Signed-off-by: Martin Blumenstingl <martin.blumenstingl@...glemail.com>
>
> I think my reviewed-by should behind your signed-off-by.
My understanding is that I have to put your Reviewed-by above my
Signed-off-by since I added the Reviewed-by to the description.
If the maintainer adds your Reviewed-by while applying the patch to
the tree they will put your Reviewed-by between my Signed-off-by and
the maintainer's Signed-off-by.

If this is incorrect then please let me know and I'll change it for v3.


Best regards,
Martin