[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20230104181701.43224-1-wander@redhat.com>
Date: Wed, 4 Jan 2023 15:17:01 -0300
From: Wander Lairson Costa <wander@...hat.com>
To: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
Juri Lelli <juri.lelli@...hat.com>,
Vincent Guittot <vincent.guittot@...aro.org>,
Dietmar Eggemann <dietmar.eggemann@....com>,
Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>,
Ben Segall <bsegall@...gle.com>, Mel Gorman <mgorman@...e.de>,
Daniel Bristot de Oliveira <bristot@...hat.com>,
Valentin Schneider <vschneid@...hat.com>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org (open list:SCHEDULER)
Cc: Wander Lairson Costa <wander@...hat.com>,
Paul McKenney <paulmck@...nel.org>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>
Subject: [PATCH] sched/deadline: fix inactive_task_timer splat with CONFIG_PREEMPT_RT
inactive_task_timer() executes in interrupt (atomic) context. It calls
put_task_struct(), which indirectly acquires sleeping locks under
PREEMPT_RT.
Below is an example of a splat that happened in a test environment:
CPU: 1 PID: 2848 Comm: life Kdump: loaded Tainted: G W ---------
Hardware name: HP ProLiant DL388p Gen8, BIOS P70 07/15/2012
Call Trace:
dump_stack_lvl+0x57/0x7d
mark_lock_irq.cold+0x33/0xba
? stack_trace_save+0x4b/0x70
? save_trace+0x55/0x150
mark_lock+0x1e7/0x400
mark_usage+0x11d/0x140
__lock_acquire+0x30d/0x930
lock_acquire.part.0+0x9c/0x210
? refill_obj_stock+0x3d/0x3a0
? rcu_read_lock_sched_held+0x3f/0x70
? trace_lock_acquire+0x38/0x140
? lock_acquire+0x30/0x80
? refill_obj_stock+0x3d/0x3a0
rt_spin_lock+0x27/0xe0
? refill_obj_stock+0x3d/0x3a0
refill_obj_stock+0x3d/0x3a0
? inactive_task_timer+0x1ad/0x340
kmem_cache_free+0x357/0x560
inactive_task_timer+0x1ad/0x340
? switched_from_dl+0x2d0/0x2d0
__run_hrtimer+0x8a/0x1a0
__hrtimer_run_queues+0x91/0x130
hrtimer_interrupt+0x10f/0x220
__sysvec_apic_timer_interrupt+0x7b/0xd0
sysvec_apic_timer_interrupt+0x4f/0xd0
? asm_sysvec_apic_timer_interrupt+0xa/0x20
asm_sysvec_apic_timer_interrupt+0x12/0x20
RIP: 0033:0x7fff196bf6f5
Instead of calling put_task_struct() directly, we defer it using
call_rcu(). A more natural approach would use a workqueue, but since
in PREEMPT_RT, we can't allocate dynamic memory from atomic context,
the code would become more complex because we would need to put the
work_struct instance in the task_struct and initialize it when we
allocate a new task_struct.
Signed-off-by: Wander Lairson Costa <wander@...hat.com>
Cc: Paul McKenney <paulmck@...nel.org>
Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>
---
kernel/sched/build_policy.c | 1 +
kernel/sched/deadline.c | 24 +++++++++++++++++++++++-
2 files changed, 24 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/kernel/sched/build_policy.c b/kernel/sched/build_policy.c
index d9dc9ab3773f..f159304ee792 100644
--- a/kernel/sched/build_policy.c
+++ b/kernel/sched/build_policy.c
@@ -28,6 +28,7 @@
#include <linux/suspend.h>
#include <linux/tsacct_kern.h>
#include <linux/vtime.h>
+#include <linux/rcupdate.h>
#include <uapi/linux/sched/types.h>
diff --git a/kernel/sched/deadline.c b/kernel/sched/deadline.c
index 9ae8f41e3372..ab9301d4cc24 100644
--- a/kernel/sched/deadline.c
+++ b/kernel/sched/deadline.c
@@ -1405,6 +1405,13 @@ static void update_curr_dl(struct rq *rq)
}
}
+static void delayed_put_task_struct(struct rcu_head *rhp)
+{
+ struct task_struct *task = container_of(rhp, struct task_struct, rcu);
+
+ __put_task_struct(task);
+}
+
static enum hrtimer_restart inactive_task_timer(struct hrtimer *timer)
{
struct sched_dl_entity *dl_se = container_of(timer,
@@ -1442,7 +1449,22 @@ static enum hrtimer_restart inactive_task_timer(struct hrtimer *timer)
dl_se->dl_non_contending = 0;
unlock:
task_rq_unlock(rq, p, &rf);
- put_task_struct(p);
+
+ if (IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_PREEMPT_RT)) {
+ /*
+ * Decrement the refcount explicitly to avoid unnecessarily
+ * calling call_rcu.
+ */
+ if (refcount_dec_and_test(&p->usage))
+ /*
+ * under PREEMPT_RT, we can't call put_task_struct
+ * in atomic context because it will indirectly
+ * acquire sleeping locks.
+ */
+ call_rcu(&p->rcu, delayed_put_task_struct);
+ } else {
+ put_task_struct(p);
+ }
return HRTIMER_NORESTART;
}
--
2.39.0
Powered by blists - more mailing lists