[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20230104183033.755668-4-pierre.gondois@arm.com>
Date: Wed, 4 Jan 2023 19:30:26 +0100
From: Pierre Gondois <pierre.gondois@....com>
To: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Cc: Pierre Gondois <pierre.gondois@....com>,
Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski@...aro.org>,
Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@....com>,
Will Deacon <will@...nel.org>,
Paul Walmsley <paul.walmsley@...ive.com>,
Palmer Dabbelt <palmer@...belt.com>,
Albert Ou <aou@...s.berkeley.edu>,
"Rafael J. Wysocki" <rafael@...nel.org>,
Len Brown <lenb@...nel.org>,
Sudeep Holla <sudeep.holla@....com>,
Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
Jeremy Linton <jeremy.linton@....com>,
Conor Dooley <conor.dooley@...rochip.com>,
Gavin Shan <gshan@...hat.com>,
linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
linux-riscv@...ts.infradead.org, linux-acpi@...r.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH v4 3/6] cacheinfo: Check 'cache-unified' property to count cache leaves
The DeviceTree Specification v0.3 specifies that the cache node
'[d-|i-|]cache-size' property is required. The 'cache-unified'
property is specifies whether the cache level is separate
or unified.
If the cache-size property is missing, no cache leaves is accounted.
This can lead to a 'BUG: KASAN: slab-out-of-bounds' [1] bug.
Check 'cache-unified' property and always account for at least
one cache leave when parsing the device tree.
[1] https://lore.kernel.org/all/0f19cb3f-d6cf-4032-66d2-dedc9d09a0e3@linaro.org/
Reported-by: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski@...aro.org>
Signed-off-by: Pierre Gondois <pierre.gondois@....com>
---
drivers/base/cacheinfo.c | 37 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++-----------
1 file changed, 26 insertions(+), 11 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/base/cacheinfo.c b/drivers/base/cacheinfo.c
index 3e965ef6ee42..339cd1e3d5af 100644
--- a/drivers/base/cacheinfo.c
+++ b/drivers/base/cacheinfo.c
@@ -225,12 +225,9 @@ static int cache_setup_of_node(unsigned int cpu)
return 0;
}
-int init_of_cache_level(unsigned int cpu)
+static int of_count_cache_leaves(struct device_node *np)
{
- struct cpu_cacheinfo *this_cpu_ci = get_cpu_cacheinfo(cpu);
- struct device_node *np = of_cpu_device_node_get(cpu);
- struct device_node *prev = NULL;
- unsigned int levels = 0, leaves = 0, level;
+ unsigned int leaves = 0;
if (of_property_read_bool(np, "cache-size"))
++leaves;
@@ -238,6 +235,28 @@ int init_of_cache_level(unsigned int cpu)
++leaves;
if (of_property_read_bool(np, "d-cache-size"))
++leaves;
+
+ if (!leaves) {
+ /* The '[i-|d-|]cache-size' property is required, but
+ * if absent, fallback on the 'cache-unified' property.
+ */
+ if (of_property_read_bool(np, "cache-unified"))
+ return 1;
+ else
+ return 2;
+ }
+
+ return leaves;
+}
+
+int init_of_cache_level(unsigned int cpu)
+{
+ struct cpu_cacheinfo *this_cpu_ci = get_cpu_cacheinfo(cpu);
+ struct device_node *np = of_cpu_device_node_get(cpu);
+ struct device_node *prev = NULL;
+ unsigned int levels = 0, leaves, level;
+
+ leaves = of_count_cache_leaves(np);
if (leaves > 0)
levels = 1;
@@ -251,12 +270,8 @@ int init_of_cache_level(unsigned int cpu)
goto err_out;
if (level <= levels)
goto err_out;
- if (of_property_read_bool(np, "cache-size"))
- ++leaves;
- if (of_property_read_bool(np, "i-cache-size"))
- ++leaves;
- if (of_property_read_bool(np, "d-cache-size"))
- ++leaves;
+
+ leaves += of_count_cache_leaves(np);
levels = level;
}
--
2.25.1
Powered by blists - more mailing lists