[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <680a52a9-7493-328d-785f-66a12ee29c91@arm.com>
Date: Wed, 4 Jan 2023 19:35:53 +0100
From: Pierre Gondois <pierre.gondois@....com>
To: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski@...aro.org>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Cc: palmer@...osinc.com, Ionela.Voinescu@....com,
Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@....com>,
Will Deacon <will@...nel.org>,
Paul Walmsley <paul.walmsley@...ive.com>,
Palmer Dabbelt <palmer@...belt.com>,
Albert Ou <aou@...s.berkeley.edu>,
"Rafael J. Wysocki" <rafael@...nel.org>,
Len Brown <lenb@...nel.org>,
Sudeep Holla <sudeep.holla@....com>,
Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
Jeremy Linton <jeremy.linton@....com>,
Conor Dooley <conor.dooley@...rochip.com>,
Gavin Shan <gshan@...hat.com>,
linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
linux-riscv@...ts.infradead.org, linux-acpi@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 0/5] arch_topology: Build cacheinfo from primary CPU
On 12/29/22 17:47, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
> On 09/12/2022 11:31, Pierre Gondois wrote:
>> v2:
>> - Applied renaming/formatting comments from v1.
>> - Check CACHE_TYPE_VALID flag in pppt.c.
>> v3:
>> - Applied Sudeep's suggestions (for patch 5/5):
>> - Renaming allocate_cache_info() -> fecth_cache_info()
>> - Updated error message
>> - Extract an inline allocate_cache_info() function
>> - Re-run checkpatch with --strict option
>>
>> Note:
>> This patchset requires the following patch to be applied first in
>> order to avoid the same bug described in the commit message:
>> https://lore.kernel.org/all/20221116094958.2141072-1-pierre.gondois@arm.com/
>>
>> [1] and [2] build the CPU topology from the cacheinfo information for
>> both DT/ACPI based systems and remove (struct cpu_topology).llc_id
>> which was used by ACPI only.
>>
>> Creating the cacheinfo for secondary CPUs is done during early boot.
>> Preemption and interrupts are disabled at this stage. On PREEMPT_RT
>> kernels, allocating memory (and parsing the PPTT table for ACPI based
>> systems) triggers a:
>> 'BUG: sleeping function called from invalid context' [4]
>>
>> To prevent this bug, allocate the cacheinfo from the primary CPU when
>> preemption and interrupts are enabled and before booting secondary
>> CPUs. The cache levels/leaves are computed from DT/ACPI PPTT information
>> only, without relying on the arm64 CLIDR_EL1 register.
>> If no cache information is found in the DT/ACPI PPTT, then fallback
>> to the current state, triggering [4] on PREEMPT_RT kernels.
>>
>> Patches to update the arm64 device trees that have incomplete cacheinfo
>> (mostly for missing the 'cache-level' or 'cache-unified' property)
>> have been sent at [3].
>>
>> Tested platforms:
>> - ACPI + PPTT: Ampere Altra, Ampere eMAG, Cavium ThunderX2,
>> Kunpeng 920, Juno-r2
>> - DT: rb5, db845c, Juno-r2
>>
>
> I gave the patchset a try with DTS fixes for cache topology on Qualcomm
> RB5 board (SM8250 SoC) and with KASAN it produces:
>
> BUG: KASAN: slab-out-of-bounds in populate_cache_leaves+0x84/0x15c
> [ 0.633014] dump_backtrace.part.0+0xe0/0xf0
> [ 0.633035] show_stack+0x18/0x40
> [ 0.633050] dump_stack_lvl+0x8c/0xb8
> [ 0.633085] print_report+0x188/0x488
> [ 0.633106] kasan_report+0xac/0xf0
> [ 0.633136] __asan_store4+0x80/0xa4
> [ 0.633158] populate_cache_leaves+0x84/0x15c
> [ 0.633181] detect_cache_attributes+0xc0/0x8c4
> [ 0.633213] update_siblings_masks+0x28/0x43c
> [ 0.633235] store_cpu_topology+0x98/0xc0
> [ 0.633251] smp_prepare_cpus+0x2c/0x15c
> [ 0.633281] kernel_init_freeable+0x22c/0x424
> [ 0.633310] kernel_init+0x24/0x13c
> [ 0.633328] ret_from_fork+0x10/0x20
> [ 0.633388]
> [ 0.708729] Allocated by task 1:
> [ 0.712078] kasan_save_stack+0x2c/0x60
> [ 0.716066] kasan_set_track+0x2c/0x40
> [ 0.719959] kasan_save_alloc_info+0x24/0x3c
> [ 0.724387] __kasan_kmalloc+0xa0/0xbc
> [ 0.728278] __kmalloc+0x74/0x110
> [ 0.731740] fetch_cache_info+0x170/0x210
> [ 0.735902] init_cpu_topology+0x254/0x2bc
> [ 0.740171] smp_prepare_cpus+0x20/0x15c
> [ 0.744272] kernel_init_freeable+0x22c/0x424
> [ 0.748791] kernel_init+0x24/0x13c
> [ 0.752420] ret_from_fork+0x10/0x20
>
> Best regards,
> Krzysztof
Hello Krzysztof,
Thanks for trying the patch-set and reporting the issue. Hopefully
the v4 should solve this:
https://lore.kernel.org/all/20230104183033.755668-1-pierre.gondois@arm.com/
I will also try to follow the corresponding dts modifications,
Regards,
Pierre
Powered by blists - more mailing lists