[<prev] [next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <214361C4-9FE1-426D-9C54-9EF332604ABE@joelfernandes.org>
Date: Thu, 5 Jan 2023 10:28:15 -0500
From: Joel Fernandes <joel@...lfernandes.org>
To: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
Cc: stable@...r.kernel.org, patches@...ts.linux.dev,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, torvalds@...ux-foundation.org,
akpm@...ux-foundation.org, linux@...ck-us.net, shuah@...nel.org,
patches@...nelci.org, lkft-triage@...ts.linaro.org, pavel@...x.de,
jonathanh@...dia.com, f.fainelli@...il.com,
sudipm.mukherjee@...il.com, srw@...dewatkins.net, rwarsow@....de
Subject: Re: [PATCH 5.10 00/63] 5.10.162-rc1 review
> On Jan 5, 2023, at 6:43 AM, Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org> wrote:
>
> On Wed, Jan 04, 2023 at 04:56:31PM -0500, Joel Fernandes wrote:
>>
>>
>>>> On Jan 4, 2023, at 12:29 AM, Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org> wrote:
>>>
>>> On Tue, Jan 03, 2023 at 04:16:07PM +0000, Joel Fernandes wrote:
>>>>> On Tue, Jan 03, 2023 at 09:13:30AM +0100, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
>>>>> This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 5.10.162 release.
>>>>> There are 63 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response
>>>>> to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please
>>>>> let me know.
>>>>>
>>>>> Responses should be made by Thu, 05 Jan 2023 08:12:47 +0000.
>>>>> Anything received after that time might be too late.
>>>>>
>>>>> The whole patch series can be found in one patch at:
>>>>> https://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/v5.x/stable-review/patch-5.10.162-rc1.gz
>>>>> or in the git tree and branch at:
>>>>> git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux-stable-rc.git linux-5.10.y
>>>>> and the diffstat can be found below.
>>>>>
>>>>> thanks,
>>>>
>>>> Testing fails. Could you please pick these 2 up?
>>>> https://lore.kernel.org/r/20221230153215.1333921-1-joel@joelfernandes.org
>>>> https://lore.kernel.org/all/20221230153215.1333921-2-joel@joelfernandes.org/
>>>
>>> That is not a regression from 5.10.161, right?
>>
>> Yes it is not.
>>
>>> This release is only for
>>> the io_uring stuff to make sure that backport was done correctly.
>>>
>>> The current "to apply" queue for the stable trees is very large right
>>> now due to everyone waiting to get tiny things into -rc1 instead of
>>> before then, so the above two are still not yet queued up, sorry.
>>
>> Sure not a problem, I can resend again later if it is still not queued.
>
> You should have already received the email notices saying they were
> queued :)
I happen to take messages from Skynet with a grain of salt ;-).
But thank you for the automated notification!
- Joel
Powered by blists - more mailing lists