[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20230105004501.1771332-3-paulmck@kernel.org>
Date: Wed, 4 Jan 2023 16:44:51 -0800
From: "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@...nel.org>
To: rcu@...r.kernel.org
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, kernel-team@...a.com,
rostedt@...dmis.org, Frederic Weisbecker <frederic@...nel.org>,
Boqun Feng <boqun.feng@...il.com>,
Neeraj Upadhyay <quic_neeraju@...cinc.com>,
"Paul E . McKenney" <paulmck@...nel.org>,
Oleg Nesterov <oleg@...hat.com>,
Lai Jiangshan <jiangshanlai@...il.com>,
"Eric W . Biederman" <ebiederm@...ssion.com>
Subject: [PATCH rcu 2/6] rcu-tasks: Improve comments explaining tasks_rcu_exit_srcu purpose
From: Frederic Weisbecker <frederic@...nel.org>
Make sure we don't need to look again into the depths of git blame in
order not to miss a subtle part about how rcu-tasks is dealing with
exiting tasks.
Suggested-by: Boqun Feng <boqun.feng@...il.com>
Suggested-by: Neeraj Upadhyay <quic_neeraju@...cinc.com>
Suggested-by: Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@...nel.org>
Cc: Oleg Nesterov <oleg@...hat.com>
Cc: Lai Jiangshan <jiangshanlai@...il.com>
Cc: Eric W. Biederman <ebiederm@...ssion.com>
Signed-off-by: Frederic Weisbecker <frederic@...nel.org>
Signed-off-by: Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@...nel.org>
---
kernel/rcu/tasks.h | 37 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++--------
1 file changed, 29 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)
diff --git a/kernel/rcu/tasks.h b/kernel/rcu/tasks.h
index c418aa1c038a9..50d4c0ec7a89f 100644
--- a/kernel/rcu/tasks.h
+++ b/kernel/rcu/tasks.h
@@ -827,11 +827,21 @@ static void rcu_tasks_pertask(struct task_struct *t, struct list_head *hop)
static void rcu_tasks_postscan(struct list_head *hop)
{
/*
- * Wait for tasks that are in the process of exiting. This
- * does only part of the job, ensuring that all tasks that were
- * previously exiting reach the point where they have disabled
- * preemption, allowing the later synchronize_rcu() to finish
- * the job.
+ * Exiting tasks may escape the tasklist scan. Those are vulnerable
+ * until their final schedule() with TASK_DEAD state. To cope with
+ * this, divide the fragile exit path part in two intersecting
+ * read side critical sections:
+ *
+ * 1) An _SRCU_ read side starting before calling exit_notify(),
+ * which may remove the task from the tasklist, and ending after
+ * the final preempt_disable() call in do_exit().
+ *
+ * 2) An _RCU_ read side starting with the final preempt_disable()
+ * call in do_exit() and ending with the final call to schedule()
+ * with TASK_DEAD state.
+ *
+ * This handles the part 1). And postgp will handle part 2) with a
+ * call to synchronize_rcu().
*/
synchronize_srcu(&tasks_rcu_exit_srcu);
}
@@ -898,7 +908,10 @@ static void rcu_tasks_postgp(struct rcu_tasks *rtp)
*
* In addition, this synchronize_rcu() waits for exiting tasks
* to complete their final preempt_disable() region of execution,
- * cleaning up after the synchronize_srcu() above.
+ * cleaning up after synchronize_srcu(&tasks_rcu_exit_srcu),
+ * enforcing the whole region before tasklist removal until
+ * the final schedule() with TASK_DEAD state to be an RCU TASKS
+ * read side critical section.
*/
synchronize_rcu();
}
@@ -988,7 +1001,11 @@ void show_rcu_tasks_classic_gp_kthread(void)
EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(show_rcu_tasks_classic_gp_kthread);
#endif // !defined(CONFIG_TINY_RCU)
-/* Do the srcu_read_lock() for the above synchronize_srcu(). */
+/*
+ * Contribute to protect against tasklist scan blind spot while the
+ * task is exiting and may be removed from the tasklist. See
+ * corresponding synchronize_srcu() for further details.
+ */
void exit_tasks_rcu_start(void) __acquires(&tasks_rcu_exit_srcu)
{
preempt_disable();
@@ -996,7 +1013,11 @@ void exit_tasks_rcu_start(void) __acquires(&tasks_rcu_exit_srcu)
preempt_enable();
}
-/* Do the srcu_read_unlock() for the above synchronize_srcu(). */
+/*
+ * Contribute to protect against tasklist scan blind spot while the
+ * task is exiting and may be removed from the tasklist. See
+ * corresponding synchronize_srcu() for further details.
+ */
void exit_tasks_rcu_finish(void) __releases(&tasks_rcu_exit_srcu)
{
struct task_struct *t = current;
--
2.31.1.189.g2e36527f23
Powered by blists - more mailing lists