lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <Y7cSKFIakdGKKokE@google.com>
Date:   Fri, 6 Jan 2023 02:08:40 +0800
From:   Tzung-Bi Shih <tzungbi@...nel.org>
To:     Lee Jones <lee@...nel.org>
Cc:     Mark Hasemeyer <markhas@...omium.org>,
        LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        Raul Rangel <rrangel@...omium.org>,
        Bhanu Prakash Maiya <bhanumaiya@...omium.org>,
        Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski@...aro.org>,
        Benson Leung <bleung@...omium.org>,
        Guenter Roeck <groeck@...omium.org>,
        Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@...aro.org>,
        Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
        chrome-platform@...ts.linux.dev, devicetree@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v10 2/3] dt-bindings: mfd: Add compatible string for UART
 support

On Thu, Jan 05, 2023 at 04:27:32PM +0000, Lee Jones wrote:
> > > You should gain permission from the maintainer before you apply patches.
> > > 
> > >   % scripts/get_maintainer.pl -f Documentation/devicetree/bindings/mfd/google,cros-ec.yaml
> > >      Lee Jones <lee@...nel.org> (supporter:MULTIFUNCTION DEVICES (MFD))
> > >      Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org> (maintainer:OPEN FIRMWARE AND FLATTENED DEVICE TREE BINDINGS)
> > >      Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@...aro.org> (maintainer:OPEN FIRMWARE AND FLATTENED DEVICE TREE BINDINGS)
> > >      Matthias Brugger <matthias.bgg@...il.com> (maintainer:ARM/Mediatek SoC support)
> > 
> > I see.  I guess for the case, I should get both MFD and DT bindings
> > maintainers' Acks before applying the patch.
> 
> Yes.  The situation isn't overly clear and differs from subsystem to
> subsystem and maintainer to maintainer.  In the MFD case, Rob and
> Krzysztof conduct the first reviews.  99 times out of 100, if they're
> happy, I'm happy and I merge the changes via the MFD tree.  Same goes
> for Backlight and more recently, LEDs.

I see.  Apologize for that and I will pay more attention next time when
handling cross-subsystem patches.

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ