[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <3cab152b-ce5a-70c6-a8cf-8537faff5ab8@seco.com>
Date: Thu, 5 Jan 2023 13:17:48 -0500
From: Sean Anderson <sean.anderson@...o.com>
To: Vladimir Oltean <olteanv@...il.com>
Cc: Andrew Lunn <andrew@...n.ch>,
Heiner Kallweit <hkallweit1@...il.com>, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
Russell King <linux@...linux.org.uk>,
"David S . Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
Paolo Abeni <pabeni@...hat.com>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>,
Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>,
Tim Harvey <tharvey@...eworks.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next v5 4/4] phy: aquantia: Determine rate adaptation
support from registers
On 1/5/23 13:11, Vladimir Oltean wrote:
> I think I would prefer not exporting anything rate adaptation related to
> user space, at least until things clean up a little and we're confident
> that we don't need to radically change how it works.
Currently, we have a rate adaptation field for get_ksettings, which
indicates whether rate adaptation is occurring. To really support the
above case, we'd probably want a way for userspace to express a
preference for e.g. rate-adapted 10M over "native" 10M. I agree that we
should hold off on this until we're more confident in the
implementation.
--Sean
Powered by blists - more mailing lists