[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <Y7c6c+5h25bEcn/A@kernel-devel>
Date: Fri, 6 Jan 2023 06:00:35 +0900
From: Shigeru Yoshida <syoshida@...hat.com>
To: Mat Martineau <mathew.j.martineau@...ux.intel.com>
Cc: matthieu.baerts@...sares.net, davem@...emloft.net,
edumazet@...gle.com, kuba@...nel.org, pabeni@...hat.com,
dmytro@...tyi.net, netdev@...r.kernel.org, mptcp@...ts.linux.dev,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] mptcp: Fix deadlock in mptcp_sendmsg()
On Thu, Jan 05, 2023 at 12:26:29PM -0800, Mat Martineau wrote:
> On Fri, 6 Jan 2023, Shigeru Yoshida wrote:
>
> > __mptcp_close_ssk() can be called from mptcp_sendmsg() with subflow
> > socket locked. This can cause a deadlock as below:
> >
> > mptcp_sendmsg()
> > mptcp_sendmsg_fastopen() --> lock ssk
> > tcp_sendmsg_fastopen()
> > __inet_stream_connect()
> > mptcp_disconnect()
> > mptcp_destroy_common()
> > __mptcp_close_ssk() --> lock ssk again
> >
> > This patch fixes the issue by skipping locking for subflow socket
> > which is already locked.
> >
>
> Hi Shigeru -
>
> I believe this has already been fixed by:
>
> 7d803344fdc3 ("mptcp: fix deadlock in fastopen error path")
>
> It is in the net repo:
>
> https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/netdev/net.git
Hi Mat,
Thank you so much for your prompt response. I've missed above patch.
Yes, the patch fixed the same issue.
Thank you~
Shigeru
>
> ...but hasn't been merged to net-next or Linus' tree yet. Jakub said to
> expect a net PR today, which should get the fix both upstream and in to
> net-next.
>
> Thanks,
>
> Mat
>
> > Fixes: d98a82a6afc7 ("mptcp: handle defer connect in mptcp_sendmsg")
> > Signed-off-by: Shigeru Yoshida <syoshida@...hat.com>
> > ---
> > net/mptcp/protocol.c | 15 +++++++++------
> > net/mptcp/protocol.h | 4 ++--
> > 2 files changed, 11 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/net/mptcp/protocol.c b/net/mptcp/protocol.c
> > index f6f93957275b..979265f66082 100644
> > --- a/net/mptcp/protocol.c
> > +++ b/net/mptcp/protocol.c
> > @@ -1672,9 +1672,9 @@ static int mptcp_sendmsg_fastopen(struct sock *sk, struct sock *ssk, struct msgh
> > lock_sock(ssk);
> > msg->msg_flags |= MSG_DONTWAIT;
> > msk->connect_flags = O_NONBLOCK;
> > - msk->is_sendmsg = 1;
> > + msk->sendmsg_locked_sk = ssk;
> > ret = tcp_sendmsg_fastopen(ssk, msg, copied_syn, len, NULL);
> > - msk->is_sendmsg = 0;
> > + msk->sendmsg_locked_sk = NULL;
> > msg->msg_flags = saved_flags;
> > release_sock(ssk);
> >
> > @@ -2319,7 +2319,8 @@ static void __mptcp_close_ssk(struct sock *sk, struct sock *ssk,
> > if (dispose_it)
> > list_del(&subflow->node);
> >
> > - lock_sock_nested(ssk, SINGLE_DEPTH_NESTING);
> > + if (msk->sendmsg_locked_sk != ssk)
> > + lock_sock_nested(ssk, SINGLE_DEPTH_NESTING);
> >
> > if (flags & MPTCP_CF_FASTCLOSE) {
> > /* be sure to force the tcp_disconnect() path,
> > @@ -2335,7 +2336,8 @@ static void __mptcp_close_ssk(struct sock *sk, struct sock *ssk,
> > tcp_disconnect(ssk, 0);
> > msk->subflow->state = SS_UNCONNECTED;
> > mptcp_subflow_ctx_reset(subflow);
> > - release_sock(ssk);
> > + if (msk->sendmsg_locked_sk != ssk)
> > + release_sock(ssk);
> >
> > goto out;
> > }
> > @@ -2362,7 +2364,8 @@ static void __mptcp_close_ssk(struct sock *sk, struct sock *ssk,
> > /* close acquired an extra ref */
> > __sock_put(ssk);
> > }
> > - release_sock(ssk);
> > + if (msk->sendmsg_locked_sk != ssk)
> > + release_sock(ssk);
> >
> > sock_put(ssk);
> >
> > @@ -3532,7 +3535,7 @@ static int mptcp_connect(struct sock *sk, struct sockaddr *uaddr, int addr_len)
> > /* if reaching here via the fastopen/sendmsg path, the caller already
> > * acquired the subflow socket lock, too.
> > */
> > - if (msk->is_sendmsg)
> > + if (msk->sendmsg_locked_sk)
> > err = __inet_stream_connect(ssock, uaddr, addr_len, msk->connect_flags, 1);
> > else
> > err = inet_stream_connect(ssock, uaddr, addr_len, msk->connect_flags);
> > diff --git a/net/mptcp/protocol.h b/net/mptcp/protocol.h
> > index 955fb3d88eb3..43afc399e16b 100644
> > --- a/net/mptcp/protocol.h
> > +++ b/net/mptcp/protocol.h
> > @@ -294,8 +294,7 @@ struct mptcp_sock {
> > u8 mpc_endpoint_id;
> > u8 recvmsg_inq:1,
> > cork:1,
> > - nodelay:1,
> > - is_sendmsg:1;
> > + nodelay:1;
> > int connect_flags;
> > struct work_struct work;
> > struct sk_buff *ooo_last_skb;
> > @@ -318,6 +317,7 @@ struct mptcp_sock {
> > u32 setsockopt_seq;
> > char ca_name[TCP_CA_NAME_MAX];
> > struct mptcp_sock *dl_next;
> > + struct sock *sendmsg_locked_sk;
> > };
> >
> > #define mptcp_data_lock(sk) spin_lock_bh(&(sk)->sk_lock.slock)
> > --
> > 2.39.0
> >
> >
>
> --
> Mat Martineau
> Intel
>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists