linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v4 10/45] libnvdimm/pfn_dev: increase MAX_STRUCT_PAGE

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <63b74a6e6a909_c81f0294a5@dwillia2-xfh.jf.intel.com.notmuch>
Date:   Thu, 5 Jan 2023 14:08:46 -0800
From:   Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@...el.com>
To:     Alexander Potapenko <glider@...gle.com>,
        Marco Elver <elver@...gle.com>,
        Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@...el.com>
CC:     Alexander Viro <viro@...iv.linux.org.uk>,
        Alexei Starovoitov <ast@...nel.org>,
        Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
        Andrey Konovalov <andreyknvl@...gle.com>,
        Andy Lutomirski <luto@...nel.org>,
        Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>, Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>,
        Christoph Hellwig <hch@....de>,
        Christoph Lameter <cl@...ux.com>,
        David Rientjes <rientjes@...gle.com>,
        Dmitry Vyukov <dvyukov@...gle.com>,
        Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>,
        Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
        Herbert Xu <herbert@...dor.apana.org.au>,
        Ilya Leoshkevich <iii@...ux.ibm.com>,
        Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>, Jens Axboe <axboe@...nel.dk>,
        Joonsoo Kim <iamjoonsoo.kim@....com>,
        Kees Cook <keescook@...omium.org>,
        Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>,
        Matthew Wilcox <willy@...radead.org>,
        "Michael S. Tsirkin" <mst@...hat.com>,
        Pekka Enberg <penberg@...nel.org>,
        Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
        Petr Mladek <pmladek@...e.com>,
        Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>,
        Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
        Vasily Gorbik <gor@...ux.ibm.com>,
        Vegard Nossum <vegard.nossum@...cle.com>,
        Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@...e.cz>,
        kasan-dev <kasan-dev@...glegroups.com>,
        Linux Memory Management List <linux-mm@...ck.org>,
        Linux-Arch <linux-arch@...r.kernel.org>,
        LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 10/45] libnvdimm/pfn_dev: increase MAX_STRUCT_PAGE_SIZE

Alexander Potapenko wrote:
> (+ Dan Williams)
> (resending with patch context included)
> 
> On Mon, Jul 11, 2022 at 6:27 PM Marco Elver <elver@...gle.com> wrote:
> >
> > On Fri, 1 Jul 2022 at 16:23, Alexander Potapenko <glider@...gle.com> wrote:
> > >
> > > KMSAN adds extra metadata fields to struct page, so it does not fit into
> > > 64 bytes anymore.
> >
> > Does this somehow cause extra space being used in all kernel configs?
> > If not, it would be good to note this in the commit message.
> >
> I actually couldn't verify this on QEMU, because the driver never got loaded.
> Looks like this increases the amount of memory used by the nvdimm
> driver in all kernel configs that enable it (including those that
> don't use KMSAN), but I am not sure how much is that.
> 
> Dan, do you know how bad increasing MAX_STRUCT_PAGE_SIZE can be?

Apologies I missed this several months ago. The answer is that this
causes everyone creating PMEM namespaces on v6.1+ to lose double the
capacity of their namespace even when not using KMSAN which is too
wasteful to tolerate. So, I think "6e9f05dc66f9 libnvdimm/pfn_dev:
increase MAX_STRUCT_PAGE_SIZE" needs to be reverted and replaced with
something like:

diff --git a/drivers/nvdimm/Kconfig b/drivers/nvdimm/Kconfig
index 79d93126453d..5693869b720b 100644
--- a/drivers/nvdimm/Kconfig
+++ b/drivers/nvdimm/Kconfig
@@ -63,6 +63,7 @@ config NVDIMM_PFN
        bool "PFN: Map persistent (device) memory"
        default LIBNVDIMM
        depends on ZONE_DEVICE
+       depends on !KMSAN
        select ND_CLAIM
        help
          Map persistent memory, i.e. advertise it to the memory


...otherwise, what was the rationale for increasing this value? Were you
actually trying to use KMSAN for DAX pages?