linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] ASoC: amd: Return ENODEV if acp63 is not found.

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <3921856d-7843-4206-f888-4ac48cdc97e4@redhat.com>
Date:   Thu, 5 Jan 2023 14:09:03 -0800
From:   Tom Rix <trix@...hat.com>
To:     Nathan Chancellor <nathan@...nel.org>
Cc:     lgirdwood@...il.com, broonie@...nel.org, perex@...ex.cz,
        tiwai@...e.com, ndesaulniers@...gle.com, Vijendar.Mukunda@....com,
        Syed.SabaKareem@....com, alsa-devel@...a-project.org,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, llvm@...ts.linux.dev
Subject: Re: [PATCH] ASoC: amd: Return ENODEV if acp63 is not found.


On 1/5/23 1:49 PM, Nathan Chancellor wrote:
> Hi Tom,
>
> On Thu, Jan 05, 2023 at 04:19:12PM -0500, Tom Rix wrote:
>> The clang build fails with
>> sound/soc/amd/ps/pci-ps.c:218:2: error: variable 'ret' is used
>>    uninitialized whenever switch default is taken [-Werror,-Wsometimes-uninitialized]
>>          default:
>>          ^~~~~~~
>>
>> When no device is found -ENODEV should be returned.
>> A switch with a single case is overkill, change to if-else.
>>
>> Fixes: 1d325cdaf7a2 ("ASoC: amd: ps: refactor platform device creation logic")
>> Signed-off-by: Tom Rix <trix@...hat.com>
> Thanks for the patch! I sent basically the same thing earlier today
> (sorry for forgetting to Cc you directly) and was told it was not
> correct:
>
> https://lore.kernel.org/6bb126b7-1cb4-0c4c-d357-fadc3ffdd3f9@amd.com/
>
> I am just waiting for some feedback before sending a v2.

Looking closer, the pdev_mask is only set to ACP63_PDM_DEV_MASK so the 
case statement can be folded into the above if-check of pdev_mask.

And the default: dropped,  it looks like dead code.

Please cc me on the v2,

Tom

>
>> ---
>>   sound/soc/amd/ps/pci-ps.c | 7 +++----
>>   1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/sound/soc/amd/ps/pci-ps.c b/sound/soc/amd/ps/pci-ps.c
>> index 401cfd0036be..cba8800ab4ea 100644
>> --- a/sound/soc/amd/ps/pci-ps.c
>> +++ b/sound/soc/amd/ps/pci-ps.c
>> @@ -205,8 +205,7 @@ static int create_acp63_platform_devs(struct pci_dev *pci, struct acp63_dev_data
>>   		memset(&pdevinfo, 0, sizeof(pdevinfo));
>>   	}
>>   
>> -	switch (adata->pdev_mask) {
>> -	case ACP63_PDM_DEV_MASK:
>> +	if (adata->pdev_mask == ACP63_PDM_DEV_MASK) {
>>   		adata->pdm_dev_index  = 0;
>>   		acp63_fill_platform_dev_info(&pdevinfo[0], parent, NULL, "acp_ps_pdm_dma",
>>   					     0, adata->res, 1, NULL, 0);
>> @@ -214,8 +213,8 @@ static int create_acp63_platform_devs(struct pci_dev *pci, struct acp63_dev_data
>>   					     0, NULL, 0, NULL, 0);
>>   		acp63_fill_platform_dev_info(&pdevinfo[2], parent, NULL, "acp_ps_mach",
>>   					     0, NULL, 0, NULL, 0);
>> -		break;
>> -	default:
>> +	} else {
>> +		ret = -ENODEV;
>>   		dev_dbg(&pci->dev, "No PDM devices found\n");
>>   		goto de_init;
>>   	}
>> -- 
>> 2.27.0
>>
>>