linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v2] hugetlb: unshare some PMDs when splitting VMAs

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <Y7dN5GWQVdG5BvPw@monkey>
Date:   Thu, 5 Jan 2023 14:23:32 -0800
From:   Mike Kravetz <mike.kravetz@...cle.com>
To:     James Houghton <jthoughton@...gle.com>
Cc:     Muchun Song <songmuchun@...edance.com>,
        Peter Xu <peterx@...hat.com>,
        Axel Rasmussen <axelrasmussen@...gle.com>,
        Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>, linux-mm@...ck.org,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] hugetlb: unshare some PMDs when splitting VMAs

On 01/04/23 23:19, James Houghton wrote:
> PMD sharing can only be done in PUD_SIZE-aligned pieces of VMAs;
> however, it is possible that HugeTLB VMAs are split without unsharing
> the PMDs first.
> 
> Without this fix, it is possible to hit the uffd-wp-related WARN_ON_ONCE
> in hugetlb_change_protection [1]. The key there is that
> hugetlb_unshare_all_pmds will not attempt to unshare PMDs in
> non-PUD_SIZE-aligned sections of the VMA.
> 
> It might seem ideal to unshare in hugetlb_vm_op_open, but we need to
> unshare in both the new and old VMAs, so unsharing in
> hugetlb_vm_op_split seems natural.
> 
> [1]: https://lore.kernel.org/linux-mm/CADrL8HVeOkj0QH5VZZbRzybNE8CG-tEGFshnA+bG9nMgcWtBSg@mail.gmail.com/
> 
> Fixes: 6dfeaff93be1 ("hugetlb/userfaultfd: unshare all pmds for hugetlbfs when register wp")
> Signed-off-by: James Houghton <jthoughton@...gle.com>
> ---
>  mm/hugetlb.c | 44 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++---------
>  1 file changed, 35 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-)

Thanks for the updates and additional investigation,

Reviewed-by: Mike Kravetz <mike.kravetz@...cle.com>
-- 
Mike Kravetz