[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <Y7dehnZSC6ukNxKU@nvidia.com>
Date: Thu, 5 Jan 2023 19:34:30 -0400
From: Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@...dia.com>
To: Alex Williamson <alex.williamson@...hat.com>
Cc: Matthew Rosato <mjrosato@...ux.ibm.com>, cohuck@...hat.com,
borntraeger@...ux.ibm.com, jjherne@...ux.ibm.com,
akrowiak@...ux.ibm.com, pasic@...ux.ibm.com,
zhenyuw@...ux.intel.com, zhi.a.wang@...el.com, hch@...radead.org,
intel-gfx@...ts.freedesktop.org,
intel-gvt-dev@...ts.freedesktop.org, linux-s390@...r.kernel.org,
kvm@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Kevin Tian <kevin.tian@...el.com>,
Christoph Hellwig <hch@....de>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 1/1] vfio: remove VFIO_GROUP_NOTIFY_SET_KVM
On Thu, Jan 05, 2023 at 03:09:30PM -0700, Alex Williamson wrote:
> On Thu, 19 May 2022 14:33:11 -0400
> Matthew Rosato <mjrosato@...ux.ibm.com> wrote:
>
> > Rather than relying on a notifier for associating the KVM with
> > the group, let's assume that the association has already been
> > made prior to device_open. The first time a device is opened
> > associate the group KVM with the device.
> >
> > This fixes a user-triggerable oops in GVT.
>
> It seems this has traded an oops for a deadlock, which still exists
> today in both GVT-g and vfio-ap. These are the only vfio drivers that
> care about kvm, so they make use of kvm_{get,put}_kvm(), where the
> latter is called by their .close_device() callbacks.
Bleck
It is pretty common to run the final part of 'put' from a workqueue
specifically to avoid stuff like this, eg fput does it
Maybe that is the simplest?
Jason
Powered by blists - more mailing lists