| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Message-ID: <CAK7LNAQ-MWhbiTX=phy3uzmNn+6ABZmi49D6d1n1-k-jxcQzgA@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 5 Jan 2023 12:22:50 +0900
From: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@...nel.org>
To: Nathan Chancellor <nathan@...nel.org>
Cc: linux-arch@...r.kernel.org, linux-kbuild@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Ard Biesheuvel <ardb@...nel.org>,
Thorsten Leemhuis <regressions@...mhuis.info>,
Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@....com>,
Will Deacon <will@...nel.org>,
linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
linux-riscv@...ts.infradead.org, Dennis Gilmore <dennis@...il.us>,
Albert Ou <aou@...s.berkeley.edu>,
Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>,
Jisheng Zhang <jszhang@...nel.org>,
Nicolas Schier <nicolas@...sle.eu>,
Palmer Dabbelt <palmer@...belt.com>,
Paul Walmsley <paul.walmsley@...ive.com>, llvm@...ts.linux.dev
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] arch: fix broken BuildID for arm64 and riscv
On Mon, Jan 2, 2023 at 1:16 PM Nathan Chancellor <nathan@...nel.org> wrote:
>
> Hi Masahiro,
>
> On Tue, Dec 27, 2022 at 03:45:37AM +0900, Masahiro Yamada wrote:
> > Dennis Gilmore reports that the BuildID is missing in the arm64 vmlinux
> > since commit 994b7ac1697b ("arm64: remove special treatment for the
> > link order of head.o").
> >
> > The issue is that the type of .notes section, which contains the BuildID,
> > changed from NOTES to PROGBITS.
> >
> > Ard Biesheuvel figured out that whichever object gets linked first gets
> > to decide the type of a section. The PROGBITS type is the result of the
> > compiler emitting .note.GNU-stack as PROGBITS rather than NOTE.
> >
> > While Ard provided a fix for arm64, I want to fix this globally because
> > the same issue is happening on riscv since commit 2348e6bf4421 ("riscv:
> > remove special treatment for the link order of head.o"). This problem
> > will happen in general for other architectures if they start to drop
> > unneeded entries from scripts/head-object-list.txt.
> >
> > Discard .note.GNU-stack in include/asm-generic/vmlinux.lds.h.
> >
> > Link: https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/CAABkxwuQoz1CTbyb57n0ZX65eSYiTonFCU8-LCQc=74D=xE=rA@mail.gmail.com/
> > Fixes: 994b7ac1697b ("arm64: remove special treatment for the link order of head.o")
> > Fixes: 2348e6bf4421 ("riscv: remove special treatment for the link order of head.o")
> > Reported-by: Dennis Gilmore <dennis@...il.us>
> > Suggested-by: Ard Biesheuvel <ardb@...nel.org>
> > Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@...nel.org>
> > ---
> >
> > Changes in v2:
> > - discard .note.GNU-stack before .notes because many architectures
> > call DISCARDS at the end of their linker scripts
> >
> > include/asm-generic/vmlinux.lds.h | 5 +++++
> > 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+)
> >
> > diff --git a/include/asm-generic/vmlinux.lds.h b/include/asm-generic/vmlinux.lds.h
> > index a94219e9916f..659bf3b31c91 100644
> > --- a/include/asm-generic/vmlinux.lds.h
> > +++ b/include/asm-generic/vmlinux.lds.h
> > @@ -891,7 +891,12 @@
> > #define PRINTK_INDEX
> > #endif
> >
> > +/*
> > + * Discard .note.GNU-stack, which is emitted as PROGBITS by the compiler.
> > + * Otherwise, the type of .notes section would become PROGBITS instead of NOTES.
> > + */
> > #define NOTES \
> > + /DISCARD/ : { *(.note.GNU-stack) } \
> > .notes : AT(ADDR(.notes) - LOAD_OFFSET) { \
> > BOUNDED_SECTION_BY(.note.*, _notes) \
> > } NOTES_HEADERS \
> > --
> > 2.34.1
> >
> >
>
> I just bisected this change as the cause of a few link failures that we
> now see in CI with Debian's binutils (2.35.2):
>
> https://storage.tuxsuite.com/public/clangbuiltlinux/continuous-integration2/builds/2Jjl88DXc3YRi2RtvXAzlS8NQ4p/build.log
>
> This does not appear to be related to clang/LLVM because I can easily
> reproduce it with Debian's s390x GCC and binutils building defconfig:
>
> $ s390x-linux-gnu-gcc --version | head -1
> s390x-linux-gnu-gcc (Debian 10.2.1-6) 10.2.1 20210110
>
> $ s390x-linux-gnu-ld --version | head -1
> GNU ld (GNU Binutils for Debian) 2.35.2
>
> $ make -skj"$(nproc)" ARCH=s390 CROSS_COMPILE=s390x-linux-gnu- O=build mrproper defconfig all
> ...
> `.exit.text' referenced in section `.s390_return_reg' of fs/jbd2/journal.o: defined in discarded section `.exit.text' of fs/jbd2/journal.o
> `.exit.text' referenced in section `__jump_table' of fs/fuse/inode.o: defined in discarded section `.exit.text' of fs/fuse/inode.o
> `.exit.text' referenced in section `__jump_table' of fs/fuse/inode.o: defined in discarded section `.exit.text' of fs/fuse/inode.o
> `.exit.text' referenced in section `.s390_indirect_call' of fs/btrfs/super.o: defined in discarded section `.exit.text' of fs/btrfs/super.o
> `.exit.text' referenced in section `.s390_return_mem' of fs/btrfs/super.o: defined in discarded section `.exit.text' of fs/btrfs/super.o
> `.exit.text' referenced in section `.s390_return_mem' of fs/btrfs/volumes.o: defined in discarded section `.exit.text' of fs/btrfs/volumes.o
> `.exit.text' referenced in section `.s390_return_mem' of fs/btrfs/volumes.o: defined in discarded section `.exit.text' of fs/btrfs/volumes.o
> `.exit.text' referenced in section `__bug_table' of crypto/algboss.o: defined in discarded section `.exit.text' of crypto/algboss.o
> `.exit.text' referenced in section `.s390_return_mem' of crypto/algboss.o: defined in discarded section `.exit.text' of crypto/algboss.o
> `.exit.text' referenced in section `.s390_return_reg' of crypto/xor.o: defined in discarded section `.exit.text' of crypto/xor.o
> `.exit.text' referenced in section `.s390_return_reg' of lib/atomic64_test.o: defined in discarded section `.exit.text' of lib/atomic64_test.o
> `.exit.text' referenced in section `.s390_return_mem' of drivers/char/tpm/tpm-dev-common.o: defined in discarded section `.exit.text' of drivers/char/tpm/tpm-dev-common.o
> `.exit.text' referenced in section `.s390_return_mem' of drivers/char/tpm/tpm-dev-common.o: defined in discarded section `.exit.text' of drivers/char/tpm/tpm-dev-common.o
> `.exit.text' referenced in section `.s390_return_mem' of drivers/scsi/sd.o: defined in discarded section `.exit.text' of drivers/scsi/sd.o
> `.exit.text' referenced in section `.altinstructions' of drivers/md/md.o: defined in discarded section `.exit.text' of drivers/md/md.o
> `.exit.text' referenced in section `.altinstructions' of drivers/md/md.o: defined in discarded section `.exit.text' of drivers/md/md.o
> `.exit.text' referenced in section `.s390_indirect_call' of drivers/md/dm.o: defined in discarded section `.exit.text' of drivers/md/dm.o
> `.exit.text' referenced in section `.s390_return_reg' of net/802/psnap.o: defined in discarded section `.exit.text' of net/802/psnap.o
> `.exit.text' referenced in section `.altinstructions' of net/iucv/iucv.o: defined in discarded section `.exit.text' of net/iucv/iucv.o
> `.exit.text' referenced in section `__bug_table' of drivers/s390/cio/qdio_thinint.o: defined in discarded section `.exit.text' of drivers/s390/cio/qdio_thinint.o
> `.exit.text' referenced in section `.s390_return_mem' of drivers/s390/block/dasd_diag.o: defined in discarded section `.exit.text' of drivers/s390/block/dasd_diag.o
> `.exit.text' referenced in section `.s390_return_mem' of drivers/s390/char/tty3270.o: defined in discarded section `.exit.text' of drivers/s390/char/tty3270.o
> `.exit.text' referenced in section `__bug_table' of drivers/s390/net/qeth_l3_main.o: defined in discarded section `.exit.text' of drivers/s390/net/qeth_l3_main.o
> `.exit.text' referenced in section `__bug_table' of drivers/s390/net/qeth_l3_main.o: defined in discarded section `.exit.text' of drivers/s390/net/qeth_l3_main.o
> s390x-linux-gnu-ld: BFD (GNU Binutils for Debian) 2.35.2 assertion fail ../../bfd/elf64-s390.c:3349
> ...
>
> I ended up bisecting binutils for the fix, as I could not reproduce it
> with 2.36+. My bisect landed on commit 21401fc7bf6 ("Duplicate output
> sections in scripts"):
>
> https://sourceware.org/git/?p=binutils-gdb.git;a=commit;h=21401fc7bf67dbf73f4a3eda4bcfc58fa4211584
>
> Unfortunately, I cannot immediately grok why this commit cause the above
> issue nor why the binutils commit resolves it so I figured I would
> immediately report it for public investigation's sake and quicker
> resolution.
>
> Cheers,
> Nathan
I do not understand why 99cb0d917ffa affected this.
I submitted a fix to shoot the error message "discarded section .exit.text"
https://lore.kernel.org/all/20230105031306.1455409-1-masahiroy@kernel.org/T/#u
I do not understand the binutils commit either,
but it might have made something good
because EXIT_TEXT appears twice, in .exit.text, and /DISCARD/.
--
Best Regards
Masahiro Yamada
Powered by blists - more mailing lists