[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20230105002305.1768591-6-paulmck@kernel.org>
Date: Wed, 4 Jan 2023 16:23:01 -0800
From: "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@...nel.org>
To: rcu@...r.kernel.org
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, kernel-team@...a.com,
rostedt@...dmis.org, "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@...nel.org>
Subject: [PATCH rcu 06/10] rcu: Suppress smp_processor_id() complaint in synchronize_rcu_expedited_wait()
The normal grace period's RCU CPU stall warnings are invoked from the
scheduling-clock interrupt handler, and can thus invoke smp_processor_id()
with impunity, which allows them to directly invoke dump_cpu_task().
In contrast, the expedited grace period's RCU CPU stall warnings are
invoked from process context, which causes the dump_cpu_task() function's
calls to smp_processor_id() to complain bitterly in debug kernels.
This commit therefore causes synchronize_rcu_expedited_wait() to disable
preemption around its call to dump_cpu_task().
Signed-off-by: Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@...nel.org>
---
kernel/rcu/tree_exp.h | 2 ++
1 file changed, 2 insertions(+)
diff --git a/kernel/rcu/tree_exp.h b/kernel/rcu/tree_exp.h
index ed6c3cce28f23..927abaf6c822e 100644
--- a/kernel/rcu/tree_exp.h
+++ b/kernel/rcu/tree_exp.h
@@ -667,7 +667,9 @@ static void synchronize_rcu_expedited_wait(void)
mask = leaf_node_cpu_bit(rnp, cpu);
if (!(READ_ONCE(rnp->expmask) & mask))
continue;
+ preempt_disable(); // For smp_processor_id() in dump_cpu_task().
dump_cpu_task(cpu);
+ preempt_enable();
}
}
jiffies_stall = 3 * rcu_exp_jiffies_till_stall_check() + 3;
--
2.31.1.189.g2e36527f23
Powered by blists - more mailing lists