[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1ef288af-885a-f724-ea37-199f181e4937@linux.intel.com>
Date: Thu, 5 Jan 2023 13:58:42 +0800
From: Baolu Lu <baolu.lu@...ux.intel.com>
To: Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@...dia.com>
Cc: baolu.lu@...ux.intel.com, Joerg Roedel <joro@...tes.org>,
Christoph Hellwig <hch@...radead.org>,
Kevin Tian <kevin.tian@...el.com>,
Will Deacon <will@...nel.org>,
Robin Murphy <robin.murphy@....com>,
Jean-Philippe Brucker <jean-philippe@...aro.org>,
Suravee Suthikulpanit <suravee.suthikulpanit@....com>,
Hector Martin <marcan@...can.st>,
Sven Peter <sven@...npeter.dev>,
Rob Clark <robdclark@...il.com>,
Marek Szyprowski <m.szyprowski@...sung.com>,
Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski@...aro.org>,
Andy Gross <agross@...nel.org>,
Bjorn Andersson <andersson@...nel.org>,
Yong Wu <yong.wu@...iatek.com>,
Matthias Brugger <matthias.bgg@...il.com>,
Heiko Stuebner <heiko@...ech.de>,
Matthew Rosato <mjrosato@...ux.ibm.com>,
Orson Zhai <orsonzhai@...il.com>,
Baolin Wang <baolin.wang@...ux.alibaba.com>,
Chunyan Zhang <zhang.lyra@...il.com>,
Chen-Yu Tsai <wens@...e.org>,
Thierry Reding <thierry.reding@...il.com>,
iommu@...ts.linux.dev, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 10/19] iommu: Add set_platform_dma_ops iommu ops
Hi Jason,
On 2023/1/4 21:17, Jason Gunthorpe wrote:
> On Wed, Jan 04, 2023 at 08:57:16PM +0800, Lu Baolu wrote:
>
>> diff --git a/drivers/iommu/iommu.c b/drivers/iommu/iommu.c
>> index de91dd88705b..4e35a9f94873 100644
>> --- a/drivers/iommu/iommu.c
>> +++ b/drivers/iommu/iommu.c
>> @@ -2163,6 +2163,17 @@ static int iommu_group_do_detach_device(struct device *dev, void *data)
>> return 0;
>> }
>>
>> +static int iommu_group_do_set_platform_dma(struct device *dev, void *data)
>> +{
>> + const struct iommu_ops *ops = dev_iommu_ops(dev);
>> +
>> + if (!ops->set_platform_dma_ops)
>> + return -EINVAL;
>> +
>> + ops->set_platform_dma_ops(dev);
>> + return 0;
>> +}
>> +
>> static int __iommu_group_set_domain(struct iommu_group *group,
>> struct iommu_domain *new_domain)
>> {
>> @@ -2177,10 +2188,14 @@ static int __iommu_group_set_domain(struct iommu_group *group,
>> * platform specific behavior.
>> */
>> if (!new_domain) {
>> - if (WARN_ON(!group->domain->ops->detach_dev))
>> - return -EINVAL;
> This should still have the WARN_ON..
>
> if (WARN_ON(!group->domain->ops->detach_dev && !dev_iommu_ops(dev)->set_platform_dma_ops)
This has been implicitly included in the code.
iommu_group_do_set_platform_dma() returns -EINVAL if the iommu driver
doesn't support set_platform_dma_ops (otherwise always return success).
Then, the domain->ops->detach_dev is required and a WARN_ON was there.
if (!new_domain) {
ret = __iommu_group_for_each_dev(group, NULL,
iommu_group_do_set_platform_dma);
if (ret) {
if (WARN_ON(!group->domain->ops->detach_dev))
return -EINVAL;
__iommu_group_for_each_dev(group, group->domain,
iommu_group_do_detach_device);
}
group->domain = NULL;
return 0;
}
Perhaps I should add a comment to explain this?
--
Best regards,
baolu
Powered by blists - more mailing lists