[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <b6b428a9-f411-a813-0f9f-11b7b57f64c1@redhat.com>
Date: Thu, 5 Jan 2023 09:16:43 +0100
From: David Hildenbrand <david@...hat.com>
To: Peter Xu <peterx@...hat.com>, linux-mm@...ck.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Cc: Mike Kravetz <mike.kravetz@...cle.com>,
Muchun Song <songmuchun@...edance.com>,
Nadav Amit <nadav.amit@...il.com>,
Andrea Arcangeli <aarcange@...hat.com>,
James Houghton <jthoughton@...gle.com>,
Axel Rasmussen <axelrasmussen@...gle.com>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/3] mm/uffd: Fix missing markers on hugetlb
On 04.01.23 23:52, Peter Xu wrote:
> When James was developing the vma split fix for hugetlb pmd sharing, he
> found that hugetlb uffd-wp is broken with the test case he developed [1]:
>
> https://lore.kernel.org/r/CADrL8HWSym93=yNpTUdWebOEzUOTR2ffbfUk04XdK6O+PNJNoA@mail.gmail.com
>
> Missing hugetlb pgtable pages caused uffd-wp to lose message when vma split
> happens to be across a shared huge pmd range in the test.
>
> The issue is pgtable pre-allocation on hugetlb path was overlooked. That
> was fixed in patch 1.
Nice timing, I stumbled over that while adjusting background snapshot
code in QEMU and wondered why we are not allocating page tables in that
case -- and wanted to ask you why :)
--
Thanks,
David / dhildenb
Powered by blists - more mailing lists