[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <4c4551c787ee4fc9ac40b34707d7365a@AcuMS.aculab.com>
Date: Thu, 5 Jan 2023 08:34:40 +0000
From: David Laight <David.Laight@...LAB.COM>
To: 'Martin Blumenstingl' <martin.blumenstingl@...glemail.com>
CC: Ping-Ke Shih <pkshih@...ltek.com>,
"linux-wireless@...r.kernel.org" <linux-wireless@...r.kernel.org>,
"kvalo@...nel.org" <kvalo@...nel.org>,
"tehuang@...ltek.com" <tehuang@...ltek.com>,
"s.hauer@...gutronix.de" <s.hauer@...gutronix.de>,
"tony0620emma@...il.com" <tony0620emma@...il.com>,
"netdev@...r.kernel.org" <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: RE: [PATCH 1/4] rtw88: Add packed attribute to the eFuse structs
From: Martin Blumenstingl
> Sent: 04 January 2023 17:49
>
> On Wed, Jan 4, 2023 at 5:31 PM David Laight <David.Laight@...lab.com> wrote:
> [...]
> > > > What you may want to do is add compile-time asserts for the
> > > > sizes of the structures.
> > > Do I get you right that something like:
> > > BUILD_BUG_ON(sizeof(rtw8821c_efuse) != 256);
> > > is what you have in mind?
> >
> > That looks like the one...
> I tried this (see the attached patch - it's just meant to show what I
> did, it's not meant to be applied upstream).
> With the attached patch but no other patches this makes the rtw88
> driver compile fine on 6.2-rc2.
>
> Adding __packed to struct rtw8723d_efuse changes the size of that
> struct for me (I'm compiling for AArch64 / ARM64).
> With the packed attribute it has 267 bytes, without 268 bytes.
>
> Do you have any ideas as to why that is?
Tail padding - you won't get an odd length for a structure
that contains a 16bit item.
OTOH I doubt you care about the size of that structure, just
the offset of the union and the sizes of the union members.
David
-
Registered Address Lakeside, Bramley Road, Mount Farm, Milton Keynes, MK1 1PT, UK
Registration No: 1397386 (Wales)
Powered by blists - more mailing lists