linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 05/10] serial: Convert uart_{,port_}startup() init

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <Y7aUY9WJdbtyKXm7@hovoldconsulting.com>
Date:   Thu, 5 Jan 2023 10:12:03 +0100
From:   Johan Hovold <johan@...nel.org>
To:     Jiri Slaby <jirislaby@...nel.org>
Cc:     Ilpo Järvinen <ilpo.jarvinen@...ux.intel.com>,
        linux-serial@...r.kernel.org,
        Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 05/10] serial: Convert uart_{,port_}startup() init_hw
 param to bool

On Thu, Jan 05, 2023 at 07:05:17AM +0100, Jiri Slaby wrote:
> On 04. 01. 23, 16:15, Ilpo Järvinen wrote:
> > Convert init_hw parameter in uart_startup() and uart_port_startup() to
> > bool as code treats them like bool.
> > 
> > Signed-off-by: Ilpo Järvinen <ilpo.jarvinen@...ux.intel.com>
> > ---
> >   drivers/tty/serial/serial_core.c | 12 +++++-------
> >   1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)
> > 
> > diff --git a/drivers/tty/serial/serial_core.c b/drivers/tty/serial/serial_core.c
> > index c881fefa3d97..a0260a40bdb9 100644
> > --- a/drivers/tty/serial/serial_core.c
> > +++ b/drivers/tty/serial/serial_core.c
> > @@ -181,8 +181,7 @@ static void uart_port_dtr_rts(struct uart_port *uport, int raise)
> >    * Startup the port.  This will be called once per open.  All calls
> >    * will be serialised by the per-port mutex.
> >    */
> > -static int uart_port_startup(struct tty_struct *tty, struct uart_state *state,
> > -		int init_hw)
> > +static int uart_port_startup(struct tty_struct *tty, struct uart_state *state, bool init_hw)
> >   {
> >   	struct uart_port *uport = uart_port_check(state);
> >   	unsigned long flags;
> > @@ -253,8 +252,7 @@ static int uart_port_startup(struct tty_struct *tty, struct uart_state *state,
> >   	return retval;
> >   }
> >   
> > -static int uart_startup(struct tty_struct *tty, struct uart_state *state,
> > -		int init_hw)
> > +static int uart_startup(struct tty_struct *tty, struct uart_state *state, bool init_hw)
> 
> You made both of them over 80 characters/line. Why?

I also still consider 80 chars to be a soft limit to strive for, but for
function signatures breaking that may even be preferred as it allows for
easier grepping. I believe Linus has expressed this explicitly in the
past too.

Johan