[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <Y7a4CTV+RNhoI/S7@corigine.com>
Date: Thu, 5 Jan 2023 12:44:09 +0100
From: Simon Horman <simon.horman@...igine.com>
To: yang.yang29@....com.cn
Cc: kvalo@...nel.org, davem@...emloft.net, edumazet@...gle.com,
kuba@...nel.org, pabeni@...hat.com, linux-wireless@...r.kernel.org,
netdev@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
xu.panda@....com.cn
Subject: Re: [PATCH wireless-next v2] wl18xx: use strscpy() to instead of
strncpy()
On Mon, Dec 26, 2022 at 07:14:06PM +0800, yang.yang29@....com.cn wrote:
> From: Xu Panda <xu.panda@....com.cn>
>
> The implementation of strscpy() is more robust and safer.
> That's now the recommended way to copy NUL-terminated strings.
>
> Signed-off-by: Xu Panda <xu.panda@....com.cn>
> Signed-off-by: Yang Yang <yang.yang29@....com>
> ---
> change for v2
> - use the right tag of wireless-next.
Reviewed-by: Simon Horman <simon.horman@...igine.com>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists