linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH printk v4 7/8] printk: use printk

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <87fscpch67.fsf@jogness.linutronix.de>
Date:   Thu, 05 Jan 2023 13:20:08 +0106
From:   John Ogness <john.ogness@...utronix.de>
To:     Petr Mladek <pmladek@...e.com>
Cc:     Sergey Senozhatsky <senozhatsky@...omium.org>,
        Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>,
        Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH printk v4 7/8] printk: use printk_buffers for devkmsg

On 2023-01-05, John Ogness <john.ogness@...utronix.de> wrote:
>  /* /dev/kmsg - userspace message inject/listen interface */
>  struct devkmsg_user {
>  	atomic64_t seq;
>  	struct ratelimit_state rs;
>  	struct mutex lock;
> -	char buf[CONSOLE_EXT_LOG_MAX];
>  
> +	struct printk_buffers pbufs;
>  	struct printk_info info;
> -	char text_buf[CONSOLE_EXT_LOG_MAX];
>  	struct printk_record record;
>  };

There is also no need for the printk_info and printk_record
structs. printk_get_next_message() uses its own on the stack.

> @@ -797,7 +801,7 @@ static ssize_t devkmsg_read(struct file *file, char __user *buf,
>  	if (ret)
>  		return ret;
>  
> -	if (!prb_read_valid(prb, atomic64_read(&user->seq), r)) {
> +	if (!printk_get_next_message(&pmsg, atomic64_read(&user->seq), true)) {

This needs to be a while loop because printk_get_next_message() should
be the only function reading from the ringbuffer. The
wait_event_interruptible() in this loop should just wait for the
existence of the new record. It should not be the one reading it.

I will reply to this message with the correct patch to replace this
patch.

John Ogness