lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:   Thu, 5 Jan 2023 13:20:45 +0100
From:   Steen Hegelund <steen.hegelund@...rochip.com>
To:     Dan Carpenter <error27@...il.com>
CC:     "David S . Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
        Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>,
        Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>,
        Paolo Abeni <pabeni@...hat.com>,
        <UNGLinuxDriver@...rochip.com>,
        Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@...radead.org>,
        Casper Andersson <casper.casan@...il.com>,
        "Russell King" <rmk+kernel@...linux.org.uk>,
        Wan Jiabing <wanjiabing@...o.com>,
        "Nathan Huckleberry" <nhuck@...gle.com>,
        <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
        <linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
        "Daniel Machon" <daniel.machon@...rochip.com>,
        Horatiu Vultur <horatiu.vultur@...rochip.com>,
        Lars Povlsen <lars.povlsen@...rochip.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next 2/8] net: microchip: sparx5: Reset VCAP counter
 for new rules

Hi Dan,

On Thu, 2023-01-05 at 13:58 +0300, Dan Carpenter wrote:
> EXTERNAL EMAIL: Do not click links or open attachments unless you know the
> content is safe
> 
> [ Email re-arranged because I screwed up - dan]
> 
> On Thu, Jan 05, 2023 at 11:43:17AM +0100, Steen Hegelund wrote:
> 
> > This series was first sent to net, but the response was that I should go
> > into
> > net-next instead, so it is really a first version in net-next.
> > 
> > What was your question?  I was not able to find it...
> 
> Ugh...  Oauth2 code (mutt/msmtp) silently ate my email.  Sorry.
> 
> > > > @@ -1833,6 +1834,8 @@ int vcap_add_rule(struct vcap_rule *rule)
> > > >       ret = vcap_write_rule(ri);
> > > >       if (ret)
> > > >               pr_err("%s:%d: rule write error: %d\n", __func__,
> > > > __LINE__,
> > > > ret);
> 
> There should be a "goto out;" after the pr_err().

Indeed - You are right.  I will add that in the next series.

> 
> > > > +     /* Set the counter to zero */
> > > > +     ret = vcap_write_counter(ri, &ctr);
> > > >  out:
> > > >       mutex_unlock(&ri->admin->lock);
> > > >       return ret;
> > > 
> 
> regards,
> dan carpenter
> 

Thanks for the feedback.

BR
Steen

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ