linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v9 08/15] drm/bridge: add psr support for panel bridge callbacks

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <47cd5078-f994-e05a-624c-4e221dc74294@linaro.org>
Date:   Thu, 5 Jan 2023 15:16:11 +0200
From:   Dmitry Baryshkov <dmitry.baryshkov@...aro.org>
To:     Vinod Polimera <quic_vpolimer@...cinc.com>,
        dri-devel@...ts.freedesktop.org, linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org,
        freedreno@...ts.freedesktop.org, devicetree@...r.kernel.org,
        quic_kalyant@...cinc.com, quic_sbillaka@...cinc.com,
        quic_bjorande@...cinc.com, quic_abhinavk@...cinc.com,
        quic_vproddut@...cinc.com, quic_khsieh@...cinc.com,
        dianders@...omium.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        quic_aravindh@...cinc.com, swboyd@...omium.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v9 08/15] drm/bridge: add psr support for panel bridge
 callbacks

On 05/01/2023 15:11, Daniel Vetter wrote:
> On Wed, Dec 14, 2022 at 03:35:45PM +0530, Vinod Polimera wrote:
>> This change will handle the psr entry exit cases in the panel
>> bridge atomic callback functions. For example, the panel power
>> should not turn off if the panel is entering psr.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Sankeerth Billakanti <quic_sbillaka@...cinc.com>
>> Signed-off-by: Vinod Polimera <quic_vpolimer@...cinc.com>
> 
> I think this is all a nice integration of the sr helpers and bridge stuff
> and makes sense to me. For the 2 bridge patches and the drm core atomic
> patch:
> 
> Reviewed-by: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@...ll.ch>

Thank you! I was looking at the patchset and wondering if anybody from 
drm core can actually review the core bits.

Could you please send all r-b letters, so that we don't loose them when 
applying the patches from patchwork?

> 
>> ---
>>   drivers/gpu/drm/bridge/panel.c | 48 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>>   1 file changed, 48 insertions(+)
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/bridge/panel.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/bridge/panel.c
>> index 3558cbf..5e77e38 100644
>> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/bridge/panel.c
>> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/bridge/panel.c
>> @@ -113,6 +113,18 @@ static void panel_bridge_atomic_pre_enable(struct drm_bridge *bridge,
>>   				struct drm_bridge_state *old_bridge_state)
>>   {
>>   	struct panel_bridge *panel_bridge = drm_bridge_to_panel_bridge(bridge);
>> +	struct drm_atomic_state *atomic_state = old_bridge_state->base.state;
>> +	struct drm_encoder *encoder = bridge->encoder;
>> +	struct drm_crtc *crtc;
>> +	struct drm_crtc_state *old_crtc_state;
>> +
>> +	crtc = drm_atomic_get_new_crtc_for_encoder(atomic_state, encoder);
>> +	if (!crtc)
>> +		return;
>> +
>> +	old_crtc_state = drm_atomic_get_old_crtc_state(atomic_state, crtc);
>> +	if (old_crtc_state && old_crtc_state->self_refresh_active)
>> +		return;
>>   
>>   	drm_panel_prepare(panel_bridge->panel);
>>   }
>> @@ -121,6 +133,18 @@ static void panel_bridge_atomic_enable(struct drm_bridge *bridge,
>>   				struct drm_bridge_state *old_bridge_state)
>>   {
>>   	struct panel_bridge *panel_bridge = drm_bridge_to_panel_bridge(bridge);
>> +	struct drm_atomic_state *atomic_state = old_bridge_state->base.state;
>> +	struct drm_encoder *encoder = bridge->encoder;
>> +	struct drm_crtc *crtc;
>> +	struct drm_crtc_state *old_crtc_state;
>> +
>> +	crtc = drm_atomic_get_new_crtc_for_encoder(atomic_state, encoder);
>> +	if (!crtc)
>> +		return;
>> +
>> +	old_crtc_state = drm_atomic_get_old_crtc_state(atomic_state, crtc);
>> +	if (old_crtc_state && old_crtc_state->self_refresh_active)
>> +		return;
>>   
>>   	drm_panel_enable(panel_bridge->panel);
>>   }
>> @@ -129,6 +153,18 @@ static void panel_bridge_atomic_disable(struct drm_bridge *bridge,
>>   				struct drm_bridge_state *old_bridge_state)
>>   {
>>   	struct panel_bridge *panel_bridge = drm_bridge_to_panel_bridge(bridge);
>> +	struct drm_atomic_state *atomic_state = old_bridge_state->base.state;
>> +	struct drm_encoder *encoder = bridge->encoder;
>> +	struct drm_crtc *crtc;
>> +	struct drm_crtc_state *new_crtc_state;
>> +
>> +	crtc = drm_atomic_get_old_crtc_for_encoder(atomic_state, encoder);
>> +	if (!crtc)
>> +		return;
>> +
>> +	new_crtc_state = drm_atomic_get_new_crtc_state(atomic_state, crtc);
>> +	if (new_crtc_state && new_crtc_state->self_refresh_active)
>> +		return;
>>   
>>   	drm_panel_disable(panel_bridge->panel);
>>   }
>> @@ -137,6 +173,18 @@ static void panel_bridge_atomic_post_disable(struct drm_bridge *bridge,
>>   				struct drm_bridge_state *old_bridge_state)
>>   {
>>   	struct panel_bridge *panel_bridge = drm_bridge_to_panel_bridge(bridge);
>> +	struct drm_atomic_state *atomic_state = old_bridge_state->base.state;
>> +	struct drm_encoder *encoder = bridge->encoder;
>> +	struct drm_crtc *crtc;
>> +	struct drm_crtc_state *new_crtc_state;
>> +
>> +	crtc = drm_atomic_get_old_crtc_for_encoder(atomic_state, encoder);
>> +	if (!crtc)
>> +		return;
>> +
>> +	new_crtc_state = drm_atomic_get_new_crtc_state(atomic_state, crtc);
>> +	if (new_crtc_state && new_crtc_state->self_refresh_active)
>> +		return;
>>   
>>   	drm_panel_unprepare(panel_bridge->panel);
>>   }
>> -- 
>> 2.7.4
>>
> 

-- 
With best wishes
Dmitry