[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <Y7iEjDrXLRlwoz0W@a4bf019067fa.jf.intel.com>
Date: Fri, 6 Jan 2023 12:29:00 -0800
From: Ashok Raj <ashok.raj@...el.com>
To: Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>
CC: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>, X86-kernel <x86@...nel.org>,
"LKML Mailing List" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@...el.com>,
Tony Luck <tony.luck@...el.com>,
Alison Schofield <alison.schofield@...el.com>,
Reinette Chatre <reinette.chatre@...el.com>,
Tom Lendacky <thomas.lendacky@....com>,
Ashok Raj <ashok.raj@...el.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 3/6] x86/microcode: Display revisions only when update
is successful
On Fri, Jan 06, 2023 at 08:54:30PM +0100, Borislav Petkov wrote:
> On Fri, Jan 06, 2023 at 11:42:32AM -0800, Ashok Raj wrote:
> > > 9bd681251b7c ("x86/microcode: Announce reload operation's completion")
> >
> > Thanks.. yes I can add when I resent the series.
>
> No, you should read the commit message:
>
> "issue a single line to dmesg after the reload ... to let the user know that a
> reload has at least been attempted."
>
> and drop your patch.
>
> We issue that line unconditionally to give feedback to the user that the attempt
> was actually tried. Otherwise, you don't get any feedback and you wonder whether
> it is doing anything.
>
> The prev and next revision:
>
> "microcode revision: 0x%x -> 0x%x\n",
>
> will tell you whether something got loaded or not.
Yes, that makes sense, Do you think we can add a note that the loading
failed? since the old -> new, new is coming from new microcode rev.
Reload failed/completed ?
Powered by blists - more mailing lists