[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <SJ1PR11MB6083BD0E0191061B72A47982FCFB9@SJ1PR11MB6083.namprd11.prod.outlook.com>
Date: Fri, 6 Jan 2023 21:35:41 +0000
From: "Luck, Tony" <tony.luck@...el.com>
To: Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>, "Raj, Ashok" <ashok.raj@...el.com>
CC: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>, X86-kernel <x86@...nel.org>,
"LKML Mailing List" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"Hansen, Dave" <dave.hansen@...el.com>,
"Schofield, Alison" <alison.schofield@...el.com>,
"Chatre, Reinette" <reinette.chatre@...el.com>,
Tom Lendacky <thomas.lendacky@....com>
Subject: RE: [PATCH v3 3/6] x86/microcode: Display revisions only when update
is successful
> We issue that line unconditionally to give feedback to the user that the attempt
> was actually tried. Otherwise, you don't get any feedback and you wonder whether
> it is doing anything.
>
> The prev and next revision:
>
> "microcode revision: 0x%x -> 0x%x\n",
>
> will tell you whether something got loaded or not.
Seems like a very subtle indication of a possibly important failure.
E.g. There is some security update with new microcode to mitigate.
User downloads the new microcode. Runs:
# echo 1 > /sys/devices/system/cpu/microcode/reload
[This fails for some reason]
Looks at console
# dmesg | tail -1
microcode revision: 0x40001a -> 0x4001a
User doesn't notice that the version didn't change and thinks
that all is well.
Is there an earlier message that says something like this?
microcode: initiating update to version 0x5003f
-Tony
Powered by blists - more mailing lists