lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:   Thu, 5 Jan 2023 23:08:55 -0800
From:   Sandeep Dhavale <dhavale@...gle.com>
To:     Gao Xiang <hsiangkao@...ux.alibaba.com>
Cc:     Chao Yu <chao@...nel.org>, Yue Hu <huyue2@...lpad.com>,
        Jeffle Xu <jefflexu@...ux.alibaba.com>,
        kernel-team@...roid.com, linux-erofs@...ts.ozlabs.org,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Gao Xiang <xiang@...nel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3] erofs: replace erofs_unzipd workqueue with per-cpu threads

On Thu, Jan 5, 2023 at 10:02 PM Gao Xiang <hsiangkao@...ux.alibaba.com> wrote:
>
> Hi Sandeep,
>
> On 2023/1/6 13:41, Sandeep Dhavale wrote:
> > Using per-cpu thread pool we can reduce the scheduling latency compared
> > to workqueue implementation. With this patch scheduling latency and
> > variation is reduced as per-cpu threads are high priority kthread_workers.
> >
> > The results were evaluated on arm64 Android devices running 5.10 kernel.
> >
> > The table below shows resulting improvements of total scheduling latency
> > for the same app launch benchmark runs with 50 iterations. Scheduling
> > latency is the latency between when the task (workqueue kworker vs
> > kthread_worker) became eligible to run to when it actually started
> > running.
> > +-------------------------+-----------+----------------+---------+
> > |                         | workqueue | kthread_worker |  diff   |
> > +-------------------------+-----------+----------------+---------+
> > | Average (us)            |     15253 |           2914 | -80.89% |
> > | Median (us)             |     14001 |           2912 | -79.20% |
> > | Minimum (us)            |      3117 |           1027 | -67.05% |
> > | Maximum (us)            |     30170 |           3805 | -87.39% |
> > | Standard deviation (us) |      7166 |            359 |         |
> > +-------------------------+-----------+----------------+---------+
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Sandeep Dhavale <dhavale@...gle.com>
> > ---
> > V2 -> V3
> > Fix a warning Reported-by: kernel test robot <lkp@...el.com>
> >
> > V1 -> V2
> > * Changed name of kthread_workers from z_erofs to erofs_worker
> > * Added kernel configuration to run kthread_workers at normal or
> >    high priority
> > * Added cpu hotplug support
> > * Added wrapped kthread_workers under worker_pool
> > * Added one unbound thread in a pool to handle a context where
> >    we already stopped per-cpu kthread worker
> > * Updated commit message
> >
> > Background: Boot times and cold app launch benchmarks are very
> > important to android ecosystem as they directly translate to
> > responsiveness from user point of view. While erofs provides
> > lot of important features like space savings, we saw some
> > performance penalty in cold app launch benchmarks in few scenarios.
> > Analysis showed that the significant variance was coming from the
> > scheduling cost while decompression cost was more or less the same.
> >
> > Having per-cpu thread pool we can see from above table that this
> > variation is reduced by ~80% on average. Link to LPC 2022 slides and
> > talk at [1]
> >
> > [1] https://lpc.events/event/16/contributions/1338/
>
> Let's move these words into the commit message as well for others to refer.
Sure, I will do and send V4.
>
> I think look into (and try) this version later this week.
Thank you.
-Sandeep.
>
> Thanks,
> Gao Xiang
>
> > ---
> >   fs/erofs/Kconfig |  11 +++
> >   fs/erofs/zdata.c | 201 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++------
> >   fs/erofs/zdata.h |   4 +-
> >   3 files changed, 192 insertions(+), 24 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/fs/erofs/Kconfig b/fs/erofs/Kconfig
> > index 85490370e0ca..879f493c6641 100644
> > --- a/fs/erofs/Kconfig
> > +++ b/fs/erofs/Kconfig
> > @@ -108,3 +108,14 @@ config EROFS_FS_ONDEMAND
> >         read support.
> >
> >         If unsure, say N.
> > +
> > +config EROFS_FS_KTHREAD_HIPRI
> > +     bool "EROFS high priority percpu kthread workers"
> > +     depends on EROFS_FS
> > +     default n
> > +     help
> > +       EROFS uses per cpu kthread workers pool to carry out async work.
> > +       This permits EROFS to configure per cpu kthread workers to run
> > +       at higher priority.
> > +
> > +       If unsure, say N.
> > diff --git a/fs/erofs/zdata.c b/fs/erofs/zdata.c
> > index ccf7c55d477f..b4bf2da72d1a 100644
> > --- a/fs/erofs/zdata.c
> > +++ b/fs/erofs/zdata.c
> > @@ -8,6 +8,8 @@
> >   #include "compress.h"
> >   #include <linux/prefetch.h>
> >   #include <linux/psi.h>
> > +#include <linux/slab.h>
> > +#include <linux/cpuhotplug.h>
> >
> >   #include <trace/events/erofs.h>
> >
> > @@ -184,26 +186,152 @@ typedef tagptr1_t compressed_page_t;
> >   #define tag_compressed_page_justfound(page) \
> >       tagptr_fold(compressed_page_t, page, 1)
> >
> > -static struct workqueue_struct *z_erofs_workqueue __read_mostly;
> > +struct erofs_kthread_worker_pool {
> > +     struct kthread_worker __rcu **workers;
> > +     struct kthread_worker *unbound_worker;
> > +};
> >
> > -void z_erofs_exit_zip_subsystem(void)
> > +static struct erofs_kthread_worker_pool worker_pool;
> > +DEFINE_SPINLOCK(worker_pool_lock);
> > +
> > +static void erofs_destroy_worker_pool(void)
> >   {
> > -     destroy_workqueue(z_erofs_workqueue);
> > -     z_erofs_destroy_pcluster_pool();
> > +     unsigned int cpu;
> > +     struct kthread_worker *worker;
> > +
> > +     for_each_possible_cpu(cpu) {
> > +             worker = rcu_dereference_protected(
> > +                             worker_pool.workers[cpu],
> > +                             1);
> > +             rcu_assign_pointer(worker_pool.workers[cpu], NULL);
> > +
> > +             if (worker)
> > +                     kthread_destroy_worker(worker);
> > +     }
> > +
> > +     if (worker_pool.unbound_worker)
> > +             kthread_destroy_worker(worker_pool.unbound_worker);
> > +
> > +     kfree(worker_pool.workers);
> >   }
> >
> > -static inline int z_erofs_init_workqueue(void)
> > +static inline void erofs_set_worker_priority(struct kthread_worker *worker)
> >   {
> > -     const unsigned int onlinecpus = num_possible_cpus();
> > +#ifdef CONFIG_EROFS_FS_KTHREAD_HIPRI
> > +     sched_set_fifo_low(worker->task);
> > +#else
> > +     sched_set_normal(worker->task, 0);
> > +#endif
> > +}
> >
> > -     /*
> > -      * no need to spawn too many threads, limiting threads could minimum
> > -      * scheduling overhead, perhaps per-CPU threads should be better?
> > -      */
> > -     z_erofs_workqueue = alloc_workqueue("erofs_unzipd",
> > -                                         WQ_UNBOUND | WQ_HIGHPRI,
> > -                                         onlinecpus + onlinecpus / 4);
> > -     return z_erofs_workqueue ? 0 : -ENOMEM;
> > +static int erofs_create_kthread_workers(void)
> > +{
> > +     unsigned int cpu;
> > +     struct kthread_worker *worker;
> > +
> > +     for_each_online_cpu(cpu) {
> > +             worker = kthread_create_worker_on_cpu(cpu, 0, "erofs_worker/%u", cpu);
> > +             if (IS_ERR(worker)) {
> > +                     erofs_destroy_worker_pool();
> > +                     return -ENOMEM;
> > +             }
> > +             erofs_set_worker_priority(worker);
> > +             rcu_assign_pointer(worker_pool.workers[cpu], worker);
> > +     }
> > +
> > +     worker = kthread_create_worker(0, "erofs_unbound_worker");
> > +     if (IS_ERR(worker)) {
> > +             erofs_destroy_worker_pool();
> > +             return PTR_ERR(worker);
> > +     }
> > +     erofs_set_worker_priority(worker);
> > +     worker_pool.unbound_worker = worker;
> > +
> > +     return 0;
> > +}
> > +
> > +static int erofs_init_worker_pool(void)
> > +{
> > +     int err;
> > +
> > +     worker_pool.workers = kcalloc(num_possible_cpus(),
> > +                     sizeof(struct kthread_worker *), GFP_ATOMIC);
> > +     if (!worker_pool.workers)
> > +             return -ENOMEM;
> > +     err = erofs_create_kthread_workers();
> > +
> > +     return err;
> > +}
> > +
> > +#ifdef CONFIG_HOTPLUG_CPU
> > +static enum cpuhp_state erofs_cpuhp_state;
> > +static int erofs_cpu_online(unsigned int cpu)
> > +{
> > +     struct kthread_worker *worker;
> > +
> > +     worker = kthread_create_worker_on_cpu(cpu, 0, "erofs_worker/%u", cpu);
> > +     if (IS_ERR(worker))
> > +             return -ENOMEM;
> > +
> > +     erofs_set_worker_priority(worker);
> > +
> > +     spin_lock(&worker_pool_lock);
> > +     rcu_assign_pointer(worker_pool.workers[cpu], worker);
> > +     spin_unlock(&worker_pool_lock);
> > +
> > +     synchronize_rcu();
> > +
> > +     return 0;
> > +}
> > +
> > +static int erofs_cpu_offline(unsigned int cpu)
> > +{
> > +     struct kthread_worker *worker;
> > +
> > +     spin_lock(&worker_pool_lock);
> > +     worker = rcu_dereference_protected(worker_pool.workers[cpu],
> > +                     lockdep_is_held(&worker_pool_lock));
> > +     rcu_assign_pointer(worker_pool.workers[cpu], NULL);
> > +     spin_unlock(&worker_pool_lock);
> > +
> > +     synchronize_rcu();
> > +
> > +     if (worker)
> > +             kthread_destroy_worker(worker);
> > +
> > +     return 0;
> > +}
> > +
> > +static int erofs_cpu_hotplug_init(void)
> > +{
> > +     int state;
> > +
> > +     state = cpuhp_setup_state_nocalls(CPUHP_AP_ONLINE_DYN,
> > +                     "fs/erofs:online",
> > +                     erofs_cpu_online, erofs_cpu_offline);
> > +     if (state < 0)
> > +             return state;
> > +
> > +     erofs_cpuhp_state = state;
> > +
> > +     return 0;
> > +}
> > +
> > +static void erofs_cpu_hotplug_destroy(void)
> > +{
> > +     if (erofs_cpuhp_state)
> > +             cpuhp_remove_state_nocalls(erofs_cpuhp_state);
> > +}
> > +#else /* !CONFIG_HOTPLUG_CPU */
> > +static inline int erofs_cpu_hotplug_init(void) { return 0; }
> > +static inline void erofs_cpu_hotplug_destroy(void) {}
> > +#endif
> > +
> > +void z_erofs_exit_zip_subsystem(void)
> > +{
> > +     erofs_cpu_hotplug_destroy();
> > +     erofs_destroy_worker_pool();
> > +     z_erofs_destroy_pcluster_pool();
> >   }
> >
> >   int __init z_erofs_init_zip_subsystem(void)
> > @@ -211,10 +339,23 @@ int __init z_erofs_init_zip_subsystem(void)
> >       int err = z_erofs_create_pcluster_pool();
> >
> >       if (err)
> > -             return err;
> > -     err = z_erofs_init_workqueue();
> > +             goto out_error_pcluster_pool;
> > +
> > +     err = erofs_init_worker_pool();
> >       if (err)
> > -             z_erofs_destroy_pcluster_pool();
> > +             goto out_error_worker_pool;
> > +
> > +     err = erofs_cpu_hotplug_init();
> > +     if (err < 0)
> > +             goto out_error_cpuhp_init;
> > +
> > +     return err;
> > +
> > +out_error_cpuhp_init:
> > +     erofs_destroy_worker_pool();
> > +out_error_worker_pool:
> > +     z_erofs_destroy_pcluster_pool();
> > +out_error_pcluster_pool:
> >       return err;
> >   }
> >
> > @@ -1143,7 +1284,7 @@ static void z_erofs_decompress_queue(const struct z_erofs_decompressqueue *io,
> >       }
> >   }
> >
> > -static void z_erofs_decompressqueue_work(struct work_struct *work)
> > +static void z_erofs_decompressqueue_kthread_work(struct kthread_work *work)
> >   {
> >       struct z_erofs_decompressqueue *bgq =
> >               container_of(work, struct z_erofs_decompressqueue, u.work);
> > @@ -1156,6 +1297,20 @@ static void z_erofs_decompressqueue_work(struct work_struct *work)
> >       kvfree(bgq);
> >   }
> >
> > +static void erofs_schedule_kthread_work(struct kthread_work *work)
> > +{
> > +     struct kthread_worker *worker;
> > +     unsigned int cpu = raw_smp_processor_id();
> > +
> > +     rcu_read_lock();
> > +     worker = rcu_dereference(worker_pool.workers[cpu]);
> > +     if (!worker)
> > +             worker = worker_pool.unbound_worker;
> > +
> > +     kthread_queue_work(worker, work);
> > +     rcu_read_unlock();
> > +}
> > +
> >   static void z_erofs_decompress_kickoff(struct z_erofs_decompressqueue *io,
> >                                      bool sync, int bios)
> >   {
> > @@ -1170,15 +1325,15 @@ static void z_erofs_decompress_kickoff(struct z_erofs_decompressqueue *io,
> >
> >       if (atomic_add_return(bios, &io->pending_bios))
> >               return;
> > -     /* Use workqueue and sync decompression for atomic contexts only */
> > +     /* Use kthread_workers and sync decompression for atomic contexts only */
> >       if (in_atomic() || irqs_disabled()) {
> > -             queue_work(z_erofs_workqueue, &io->u.work);
> > +             erofs_schedule_kthread_work(&io->u.work);
> >               /* enable sync decompression for readahead */
> >               if (sbi->opt.sync_decompress == EROFS_SYNC_DECOMPRESS_AUTO)
> >                       sbi->opt.sync_decompress = EROFS_SYNC_DECOMPRESS_FORCE_ON;
> >               return;
> >       }
> > -     z_erofs_decompressqueue_work(&io->u.work);
> > +     z_erofs_decompressqueue_kthread_work(&io->u.work);
> >   }
> >
> >   static struct page *pickup_page_for_submission(struct z_erofs_pcluster *pcl,
> > @@ -1306,7 +1461,7 @@ jobqueue_init(struct super_block *sb,
> >                       *fg = true;
> >                       goto fg_out;
> >               }
> > -             INIT_WORK(&q->u.work, z_erofs_decompressqueue_work);
> > +             kthread_init_work(&q->u.work, z_erofs_decompressqueue_kthread_work);
> >       } else {
> >   fg_out:
> >               q = fgq;
> > @@ -1500,7 +1655,7 @@ static void z_erofs_submit_queue(struct z_erofs_decompress_frontend *f,
> >
> >       /*
> >        * although background is preferred, no one is pending for submission.
> > -      * don't issue workqueue for decompression but drop it directly instead.
> > +      * don't issue kthread_work for decompression but drop it directly instead.
> >        */
> >       if (!*force_fg && !nr_bios) {
> >               kvfree(q[JQ_SUBMIT]);
> > diff --git a/fs/erofs/zdata.h b/fs/erofs/zdata.h
> > index d98c95212985..808bbbf71b7b 100644
> > --- a/fs/erofs/zdata.h
> > +++ b/fs/erofs/zdata.h
> > @@ -6,6 +6,8 @@
> >   #ifndef __EROFS_FS_ZDATA_H
> >   #define __EROFS_FS_ZDATA_H
> >
> > +#include <linux/kthread.h>
> > +
> >   #include "internal.h"
> >   #include "tagptr.h"
> >
> > @@ -107,7 +109,7 @@ struct z_erofs_decompressqueue {
> >
> >       union {
> >               struct completion done;
> > -             struct work_struct work;
> > +             struct kthread_work work;
> >       } u;
> >
> >       bool eio;



-- 
Thanks,
SandeepD.

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ