[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <7c569ef3-4dc5-8901-ee12-e5567a21ead9@kernel.org>
Date: Fri, 6 Jan 2023 09:16:20 +0100
From: Jiri Slaby <jirislaby@...nel.org>
To: Ilpo Järvinen <ilpo.jarvinen@...ux.intel.com>,
linux-serial@...r.kernel.org,
Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
Philippe Mathieu-Daudé <philmd@...aro.org>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 3/3] serial: 8250_rt288x: Remove unnecessary
UART_REG_UNMAPPED
On 05. 01. 23, 13:47, Ilpo Järvinen wrote:
> As unmapped registers are at the tail of the array, the ARRAY_SIZE()
> condition will catch them just fine. No need to define special
> value for them.
>
> Signed-off-by: Ilpo Järvinen <ilpo.jarvinen@...ux.intel.com>
> ---
> drivers/tty/serial/8250/8250_rt288x.c | 16 ++++------------
> 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 12 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/tty/serial/8250/8250_rt288x.c b/drivers/tty/serial/8250/8250_rt288x.c
> index 3015afb99722..7399fea6dfc1 100644
> --- a/drivers/tty/serial/8250/8250_rt288x.c
> +++ b/drivers/tty/serial/8250/8250_rt288x.c
> @@ -14,10 +14,8 @@
>
> #define RT288X_DL 0x28
>
> -#define UART_REG_UNMAPPED -1
> -
> /* Au1x00/RT288x UART hardware has a weird register layout */
> -static const s8 au_io_in_map[8] = {
> +static const s8 au_io_in_map[7] = {
> [UART_RX] = 0,
> [UART_IER] = 2,
> [UART_IIR] = 3,
> @@ -25,18 +23,14 @@ static const s8 au_io_in_map[8] = {
> [UART_MCR] = 6,
> [UART_LSR] = 7,
> [UART_MSR] = 8,
> - [UART_SCR] = UART_REG_UNMAPPED,
> };
>
> -static const s8 au_io_out_map[8] = {
> +static const s8 au_io_out_map[5] = {
And what about making them u8 at last?
> [UART_TX] = 1,
> [UART_IER] = 2,
> [UART_FCR] = 4,
> [UART_LCR] = 5,
> [UART_MCR] = 6,
> - [UART_LSR] = UART_REG_UNMAPPED,
> - [UART_MSR] = UART_REG_UNMAPPED,
> - [UART_SCR] = UART_REG_UNMAPPED,
thanks,
--
js
suse labs
Powered by blists - more mailing lists